Abstract
It has previously been shown that readers spend a great deal of time skim reading on the Web and that this type of reading can affect comprehension of text. Across two experiments, we examine how hyperlinks influence perceived importance of sentences and how perceived importance in turn affects reading behaviour. In Experiment 1, participants rated the importance of sentences across passages of Wikipedia text. In Experiment 2, a different set of participants read these passages while their eye movements were tracked, with the task being either reading for comprehension or skim reading. Reading times of sentences were analysed in relation to the type of task and the importance ratings from Experiment 1. Results from Experiment 1 show readers rated sentences without hyperlinks as being of less importance than sentences that did feature hyperlinks, and this effect is larger when sentences are lower on the page. It was also found that short sentences with more links were rated as more important, but only when they were presented at the top of the page. Long sentences with more links were rated as more important regardless of their position on the page. In Experiment 2, higher importance scores resulted in longer sentence reading times, measured as fixation durations. When skim reading, however, importance ratings had a lesser impact on online reading behaviour than when reading for comprehension. We suggest readers are less able to establish the importance of a sentence when skim reading, even though importance could have been assessed by information that would be fairly easy to extract (i.e. presence of hyperlinks, length of sentences, and position on the screen).
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference59 articles.
1. The impact of skim reading and navigation when reading hyperlinks on the web;G Fitzsimmons;PLoS One,2020
2. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years;Z. Liu;J Doc,2005
3. Equivalence of Screen Versus Print Reading Comprehension Depends on Task Complexity and Proficiency;W Lenhard;Discourse Process,2017
4. Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal;LM Singer;Rev Educ Res,2017
5. Scanning and deep processing of information in hypertext: an eye tracking and cued retrospective think-aloud study;L Salmerón;J Comput Assist Learn,2017
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Dynamic reading in a digital age: new insights on cognition;Trends in Cognitive Sciences;2024-01
2. Unveiling deception: Characterizing false amber necklace messages on Facebook;International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry;2023-09-13
3. Seven Hypertexts;Proceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media;2023-09-04
4. Seven Initial Prominent Sources of All Information Bias Impartiality Types Parsed;Media Literacy and Academic Research;2023-06-26