An international, interlaboratory ring trial confirms the feasibility of an extraction-less “direct” RT-qPCR method for reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples
Author:
Mills Margaret G.ORCID, Bruce Emily, Huang Meei-Li, Crothers Jessica W., Hyrien Ollivier, Oura Christopher A. L., Blake Lemar, Brown Jordan ArianneORCID, Hester Susan, Wehmas Leah, Mari Bernard, Barby Pascal, Lacoux Caroline, Fassy Julien, Vial PabloORCID, Vial Cecilia, Martinez Jose R. W., Oladipo Olusola Olalekan, Inuwa Bitrus, Shittu Ismaila, Meseko Clement A.ORCID, Chammas RogerORCID, Santos Carlos Ferreira, Dionísio Thiago José, Garbieri Thais Francini, Parisi Viviane Aparecida, Mendes-Correa Maria Cassia, de Paula Anderson V., Romano Camila M., Góes Luiz Gustavo Bentim, Minoprio Paola, Campos Angelica C., Cunha Marielton P.ORCID, Vilela Ana Paula P., Nyirenda Tonney, Mkakosya Rajhab Sawasawa, Muula Adamson S., Dumm Rebekah E., Harris Rebecca M., Mitchell Constance A., Pettit SyrilORCID, Botten Jason, Jerome Keith R.
Abstract
Reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is used worldwide to test and trace the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). “Extraction-less” or “direct” real time–reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a transparent and accessible qualitative method for SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal or oral pharyngeal samples with the potential to generate actionable data more quickly, at a lower cost, and with fewer experimental resources than full RT-qPCR. This study engaged 10 global testing sites, including laboratories currently experiencing testing limitations due to reagent or equipment shortages, in an international interlaboratory ring trial. Participating laboratories were provided a common protocol, common reagents, aliquots of identical pooled clinical samples, and purified nucleic acids and used their existing in-house equipment. We observed 100% concordance across laboratories in the correct identification of all positive and negative samples, with highly similar cycle threshold values. The test also performed well when applied to locally collected patient nasopharyngeal samples, provided the viral transport media did not contain charcoal or guanidine, both of which appeared to potently inhibit the RT-PCR reaction. Our results suggest that direct RT-PCR assay methods can be clearly translated across sites utilizing readily available equipment and expertise and are thus a feasible option for more efficient COVID-19 coronavirus disease testing as demanded by the continuing pandemic.
Funder
HESI Office of the Vice President, University of Vermont Fondecyt National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
Multidisciplinary
|
|