How does team diversity relate to the willingness to collaborate with asylum seekers? It depends on the diversity dimensions investigated and boundary conditions

Author:

Kotzur Patrick F.ORCID,Stricker Johannes,Fricke Ramona,McPhetres Jonathan,Meyer Bertolt

Abstract

The successful integration of asylum seekers into the labor market is among the most pressing issues of refugee-receiving countries. We construe co-workers’ willingness to collaborate with asylum seekers as a crucial factor for integration and investigate its antecedents. Linking Allport’s contact theory with team diversity theories, we propose that a work team’s diversity affects team members’ willingness to collaborate with asylum seekers. We thus investigated the effects of different facets of objective (national, migration background, age, and gender) and perceived diversity in work teams on team members’ willingness to collaborate with asylum seekers. In doing so, we also tested whether asylum seekers’ status in the team hierarchy (superior vs. colleague), task interdependence, and pro-diversity team norms moderate these effects. Multi-level regression analyses based on 470 participants nested in 106 teams showed that, overall, team diversity played a small role in explaining the willingness to collaborate with asylum seekers. Age diversity was negatively associated with the willingness to collaborate with asylum seekers, especially when asylum seekers were considered to take a post as a superior rather than a colleague. In teams with high task interdependence, migration background diversity and willingness to collaborate with asylum seekers were positively associated. Pro-diversity norms did not moderate team diversity effects. Overall, our findings demonstrate that team diversity can have beneficial, harmful, and no substantial consequences for the willingness to work with asylum seekers, depending on the considered type of diversity and boundary conditions.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference81 articles.

1. Geflüchtete Menschen in Deutschland: Eine qualitative Befragung [Fled people in Germany: A qualitative interview];H Brücker;DIW Econ Bull,2016

2. Perceptions About the Labor Market Integration of Refugees: Evidences from Syrian Refugees in Jordan;ZS Mencutek;J Int Migr Integr,2020

3. Infratest dimap. Sorgen über die Folgen der Flüchtlingszuwanderung nach Deutschland [Worries about the consequences of refugee immigration to Germany]. Infratest. 2016 March. Available from: http://www.infratest-dimap.de/umfragen-analysen/bundesweit/ard-deutschlandtrend/2016/maerz/

4. E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture;RD Putnam;Scan Polit Stud,2007

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3