Pedestrian flow characteristics through different angled bends: Exploring the spatial variation of velocity

Author:

Hannun Jamal,Dias CharithaORCID,Taha Alaa Hasan,Almutairi Abdulaziz,Alhajyaseen WaelORCID,Sarvi Majid,Al-Bosta Salim

Abstract

Common geometrical layouts could potentially be bottlenecks, particularly during emergency and high density situations. When pedestrians are interacting with such complex geometrical settings, the congestion effect might not be uniform over the bottleneck area. This study uses the trajectory data collected through a controlled laboratory experiment to explore the spatial variation of speeds when a group of people navigates through bends. Four turning angles, i.e., 45°, 90°, 135° and 180°, with a straight corridor and two speed levels, i.e., normal speed walking and slow running (jogging), were considered in these experiments. Results explained that the speeds are significantly different over the space within the bend for all angles (except 0°) under both speed levels. In particular, average walking speeds are significantly lower near the inner corner of the bend as compared to the outer corner. Further, such speed variations are magnified when the angle of the bend and desired speed increase. These outcomes indicate that even smaller turning angles, e.g., 45° could create bottlenecks near the inner corner of the bend, particularly when the walking speeds are high. The findings of this study could be useful in understanding the congestion and bottleneck effects associated with complex geometrical settings, and calibrating microscopic simulation tools to accurately reproduce such effects.

Funder

Qatar National Library

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference58 articles.

1. Crowd disasters as systemic failures: analysis of the Love Parade disaster;D. Helbing;EPJ Data Science,2012

2. Crowd disasters;K. Still,2021

3. A review of studies on understanding crowd dynamics in the context of crowd safety in mass religious gatherings;H. Gayathri;International journal of disaster risk reduction,2017

4. Empirical methods in pedestrian, crowd and evacuation dynamics;M. Haghani;Part II. Field methods and controversial topics. Safety science,2020

5. A state-of-the-art review on empirical data collection for external governed pedestrians complex movement;X. Shi;Journal of Advanced Transportation,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3