Predicting the target specialty of referral notes to estimate per-specialty wait times with machine learning

Author:

Abdalla MohamedORCID,Lu Hong,Pinzaru Bogdan,Rudzicz Frank,Jaakkimainen Liisa

Abstract

Background Currently, in Canada, existing health administrative data and hospital-inputted portal systems are used to measure the wait times to receiving a procedure or therapy after a specialist visit. However, due to missing and inconsistent labelling, estimating the wait time prior to seeing a specialist physician requires costly manual coding to label primary care referral notes. Methods In this work, we represent the notes using word-count vectors and develop a logistic regression machine learning model to automatically label the target specialist physician from a primary care referral note. These labels are not available in the administrative system. We also study the effects of note length (measured in number of tokens) and dataset size (measured in number of notes per target specialty) on model performance to help other researchers determine if such an approach may be feasible for them. We then calculate the wait time by linking the specialist type from a primary care referral to a full consultation visit held in Ontario, Canada health administrative data. Results For many target specialties, we can reliably (F1Score ≥ 0.70) predict the target specialist type. Doing so enables the automated measurement of wait time from family physician referral to specialist physician visit. Of the six specialties with wait times estimated using both 2008 and 2015 data, two had a substantial increase (defined as a change such that the original value lay outside the 95% confidence interval) in both median and 75th percentile wait times, one had a substantial decrease in both median and 75th percentile wait times, and three has non-substantial increases. Conclusions Automating these wait time measurements, which had previously been too time consuming and costly to evaluate at a population level, can be useful for health policy researchers studying the effects of policy decisions on patient access to care.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference41 articles.

1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Wait Times for Priority Procedures in Canada, 2019: Technical Notes. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2019. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/pdf-hfr-tech-notes-en-web.pdf.

2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ontario Wait Times: About Wait Times Data. (accessed August 20, 2020) http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/waittimes/surgery/data.aspx#3.

3. Schneider EC, Sarnak DO, Squires D, Shah A, Doty MM. Mirror, Mirror 2017: International Comparison Reflects Flaws and Opportunities for Better U.S. Health Care. (accessed August 20, 2020) https://interactives.commonwealthfund.org/2017/july/mirror-mirror/.

4. Barua B, Moir M. Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada, 2019 Report. 2019; Fraser Institute. (accessed August 20, 2020) https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/waiting-your-turn-2019-rev17dec.pdf.

5. Canadian Institute for Health Information. How Canada Compares: Results from the Commonwealth Fund’s 2019 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2020. (accessed September 15, 2020) https://www.cihi.ca/en/commonwealth-fund-survey-2019.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3