What drives willingness to receive a new vaccine that prevents an emerging infectious disease? A discrete choice experiment among university students in Uganda

Author:

Bonner Kimberly E.ORCID,Ssekyanzi Henry,Sicsic JonathanORCID,Mueller Judith E.ORCID,Toomey Traci,Ulrich Angela K.,Horvath Keith J.,Neaton James D.,Banura Cecily,Basta Nicole E.ORCID

Abstract

Background There is a critical need to identify the drivers of willingness to receive new vaccines against emerging and epidemic diseases. A discrete choice experiment is the ideal approach to evaluating how individuals weigh multiple attributes simultaneously. We assessed the degree to which six attributes were associated with willingness to be vaccinated among university students in Uganda. Methods We conducted a single-profile discrete choice experiment at Makerere University in 2019. Participants were asked whether or not they would be vaccinated in 8 unique scenarios where attributes varied by disease risk, disease severity, advice for or against vaccination from trusted individuals, recommendations from influential figures, whether the vaccine induced indirect protection, and side effects. We calculated predicted probabilities of vaccination willingness using mixed logistic regression models, comparing health professional students with all other disciplines. Findings Of the 1576 participants, 783 (49.8%) were health professional students and 685 (43.5%) were female. Vaccination willingness was high (78%), and higher among health students than other students. We observed the highest vaccination willingness for the most severe disease outcomes and the greatest exposure risks, along with the Minister of Health’s recommendation or a vaccine that extended secondary protection to others. Mild side effects and recommendations against vaccination diminished vaccination willingness. Interpretation Our results can be used to develop evidence-based messaging to encourage uptake for new vaccines. Future vaccination campaigns, such as for COVID-19 vaccines in development, should consider acknowledging individual risk of exposure and disease severity and incorporate recommendations from key health leaders.

Funder

Fogarty International Center

Consortium for Law and Values in Health, Environment and the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference45 articles.

1. WHO. Emergencies 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/en/.

2. Applying lessons from the Ebola vaccine experience for SARS-CoV-2 and other epidemic pathogens;J Wolf;NPJ Vaccines,2020

3. Impact of MenAfriVac in nine countries of the African meningitis belt, 2010–15: an analysis of surveillance data;CL Trotter;Lancet Infect Dis,2017

4. Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed;N Lurie;N Engl J Med,2020

5. Increasing Vaccination: Putting psychological science into action;Chapman GB TBewgBoBN;Psychological Science for the Public Interest,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3