Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis

Author:

Lee Yong YiORCID,Mihalopoulos Cathrine,Chatterton Mary Lou,Fletcher Susan L.,Chondros Patty,Densley KonstancjaORCID,Murray ElizabethORCID,Dowrick Christopher,Coe Amy,Hegarty Kelsey L.,Davidson Sandra K.,Wachtler Caroline,Palmer Victoria J.,Gunn Jane M.

Abstract

Background Target-D, a new person-centred e-health platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis (minimal/mild, moderate or severe) has demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms than usual care plus attention control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Target-D compared to usual care from a health sector and partial societal perspective across 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Methods and findings A cost-utility analysis was conducted alongside the Target-D randomised controlled trial; which involved 1,868 participants attending 14 general practices in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Data on costs were collected using a resource use questionnaire administered concurrently with all other outcome measures at baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Intervention costs were assessed using financial records compiled during the trial. All costs were expressed in Australian dollars (A$) for the 2018–19 financial year. QALY outcomes were derived using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8D (AQoL-8D) questionnaire. On a per person basis, the Target-D intervention cost between $14 (minimal/mild prognostic group) and $676 (severe group). Health sector and societal costs were not significantly different between trial arms at both 3 and 12 months. Relative to a A$50,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of Target-D being cost-effective under a health sector perspective was 81% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months. From a societal perspective, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 30% at 3 months and 80% at 12 months. Conclusions Target-D is likely to represent good value for money for health care decision makers. Further evaluation of QALY outcomes should accompany any routine roll-out to assess comparability of results to those observed in the trial. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000537459).

Funder

national health and medical research council

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference27 articles.

1. Cost of high prevalence mental disorders: Findings from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing;YC Lee;Aust N Z J Psychiatry,2017

2. Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010;AJ Ferrari;PLoS Med,2013

3. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders;GS Malhi;Aust N Z J Psychiatry,2015

4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression in adults: recognition and management, Clinical guideline (CG90) [Online]. NICE; 2009 [updated April 201821 October 2018]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90.

5. NHG-Standaard Depressie (tweede herziening) [NHG-standard depression (second revision)];EM Van Weel-Baumgarten;Huisarts Wet,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3