Disinvestment in the presence of uncertainty: Description of a novel, multi-group, disinvestment trial design and protocol for an application to reduce or cease use of mobilisation alarms for preventing falls in hospitals

Author:

Haines Terry P.ORCID,Botti Mari,Brusco Natasha,O’Brien Lisa,Redley Bernice,Bowles Kelly-AnnORCID,Hutchinson Alison,Mitchell Debra,Jellett Joanna,Steen Kate,Boyd Leanne,Webb-St Mart Melinda,Raymond Melissa,Hunter Peter,Russo Phillip,Bonnici Rachel,Pu DaiORCID,Sevenhuysen Samantha,Davies Vicki,Shorr Ronald

Abstract

Disinvestment is the removal or reduction of previously provided practices or services, and has typically been undertaken where a practice or service has been clearly shown to be ineffective, inefficient and/or harmful. However, practices and services that have uncertain evidence of effectiveness, efficiency and safety can also be considered as candidates for disinvestment. Disinvestment from these practices and services is risky as they may yet prove to be beneficial if further evidence becomes available. A novel research approach has previously been described for this situation, allowing disinvestment to take place while simultaneously generating evidence previously missing from consideration. In this paper, we describe how this approach can be expanded to situations where three or more conditions are of relevance, and describe the protocol for a trial examining the reduction and elimination of use of mobilisation alarms on hospital wards to prevent patient falls. Our approach utilises a 3-group, concurrent, non-inferiority, stepped wedge, randomised design with an embedded parallel, cluster randomised design. Eighteen hospital wards with high rates of alarm use (≥3%) will be paired within their health service and randomly allocated to a calendar month when they will transition to a “Reduced” (<3%) or “Eliminated” (0%) mobilisation alarm condition. Dynamic randomisation will be used to determine which ward in each pair will be allocated to either the reduced or eliminated condition to promote equivalence between wards for the embedded parallel, cluster randomised component of the design. A project governance committee will set non-inferiority margins. The primary outcome will be rates of falls. Secondary clinical, process, safety, and economic outcomes will be collected and a concurrent economic evaluation undertaken.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference43 articles.

1. Joshi NP, Stahnisch FW, Noseworthy TW. Reassessment of Health Technologies: Obsolescence and Waste. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Ottawa, 2009.

2. Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices;AG Elshaug;Australia and New Zealand Health Policy,2007

3. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review;DJ Niven;BMC Medicine,2015

4. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: Investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting;C Harris;BMC Health Services Research,2017

5. Health care staff responses to disinvestment-A systematic search and qualitative thematic synthesis;D Mitchell;Health Care Management Review,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3