Abstract
Disinvestment is the removal or reduction of previously provided practices or services, and has typically been undertaken where a practice or service has been clearly shown to be ineffective, inefficient and/or harmful. However, practices and services that have uncertain evidence of effectiveness, efficiency and safety can also be considered as candidates for disinvestment. Disinvestment from these practices and services is risky as they may yet prove to be beneficial if further evidence becomes available. A novel research approach has previously been described for this situation, allowing disinvestment to take place while simultaneously generating evidence previously missing from consideration. In this paper, we describe how this approach can be expanded to situations where three or more conditions are of relevance, and describe the protocol for a trial examining the reduction and elimination of use of mobilisation alarms on hospital wards to prevent patient falls. Our approach utilises a 3-group, concurrent, non-inferiority, stepped wedge, randomised design with an embedded parallel, cluster randomised design. Eighteen hospital wards with high rates of alarm use (≥3%) will be paired within their health service and randomly allocated to a calendar month when they will transition to a “Reduced” (<3%) or “Eliminated” (0%) mobilisation alarm condition. Dynamic randomisation will be used to determine which ward in each pair will be allocated to either the reduced or eliminated condition to promote equivalence between wards for the embedded parallel, cluster randomised component of the design. A project governance committee will set non-inferiority margins. The primary outcome will be rates of falls. Secondary clinical, process, safety, and economic outcomes will be collected and a concurrent economic evaluation undertaken.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference43 articles.
1. Joshi NP, Stahnisch FW, Noseworthy TW. Reassessment of Health Technologies: Obsolescence and Waste. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Ottawa, 2009.
2. Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices;AG Elshaug;Australia and New Zealand Health Policy,2007
3. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review;DJ Niven;BMC Medicine,2015
4. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: Investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting;C Harris;BMC Health Services Research,2017
5. Health care staff responses to disinvestment-A systematic search and qualitative thematic synthesis;D Mitchell;Health Care Management Review,2021
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献