The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments

Published:2014-07-30 Issue:7 Volume:9 Page:e101131
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLoS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Flórez-Vargas Oscar,Bramhall Michael,Noyes Harry,Cruickshank Sheena,Stevens Robert,Brass Andy

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference138 articles.

1. Why most published research findings are false;JP Ioannidis;PLoS Med,2005

2. Anon (19 Oct 2013) Unreliable research: Trouble at the lab. The Economist. Available: http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble. Accessed 20 October 2013.

3. Anon (14 Ags 2012) The Reproducibility Initiative. Available: https://www.scienceexchange.com/reproducibility. Accessed 17 January 2014.

4. Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research;GK Sandve;PLoS Comp Biol,2013

5. Reproducible science;A Casadevall;Infect Immun,2010

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The importance of selection and reporting of the sex of experimental animals;Animal Production Science;2019

2. A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences;PeerJ;2018-05-28

3. Introducing the TrypanoGEN biobank: A valuable resource for the elimination of human African trypanosomiasis;PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases;2017-06-01

4. The Road to Reproducibility in Animal Research;Journal of Bone and Mineral Research;2016-07

5. Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models;eLife;2016-03-03