Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data

Author:

Quigley Maria A.ORCID,Harrison SianORCID,Levene Ilana,McLeish Jenny,Buchanan Phyll,Alderdice Fiona

Abstract

Background Few studies have compared breastfeeding rates before and during the pandemic using comparable data across time. We used data from two national maternity surveys (NMS) to compare breastfeeding rates in England before and during the pandemic. Methods Analysis was conducted using the NMS from 2018 (pre-pandemic; n = 4,509) and 2020 (during the pandemic; n = 4,611). The prevalence of breastfeeding initiation, and ‘any’ breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at 6 weeks and 6 months were compared between these surveys. Data were interpreted in the context of underlying trends in these prevalences from previous NMS (from 2010 and 2014), and annual routine data for England (from 2009–10 to 2020–21). Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) for the effect of birth during the pandemic (2020 versus 2018) on breastfeeding, with adjustment for sociodemographic and birth-related factors. Results Breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 6 weeks remained relatively constant in the NMS and the routine data. Birth during the pandemic was associated with a 3 percentage point decrease in EBF at 6 weeks in the NMS (aRR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.87, 0.98 for pandemic versus pre-pandemic), but a smaller decrease in the routine data. Birth during the pandemic was associated with a 3 percentage point increase in any breastfeeding at 6 months in the NMS (aRR 1.05, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.10). Breastfeeding varied across different groups of women in the NMS (i.e. marked inequalities), but the small changes observed between the pandemic and pre-pandemic NMS were broadly similar across the sociodemographic and birth-related factors examined (i.e. no change in inequalities). Conclusion Breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 6 weeks in England were unaffected by the pandemic, and the persistent inequalities in breastfeeding did not widen. Services should aim to reduce these inequalities in breastfeeding which have been documented since the 1970s.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference38 articles.

1. Royal College of Obstericians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Midwives, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Public Health England, & Public Health Scotland. Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and pregnancy Version 12: updated 14 October 2020. Guidance for healthcare professionals on coronavirus (COVID-19) infection in pregnancy. October 2020. [Cited 21/10/22]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/coronavirus-pregnancy/

2. UNICEF Baby Friendly Initiative. Statement on supporting infant feeding during the coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreak Updated 10th July 2020. July 2020. [Cited 21/10/22] https://www.unicef.org.uk/babyfriendly/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/04/Unicef-UK-Baby-Friendly-Initiative-statement-on-infant-feeding-during-the-Covid-19-outbreak.pdf

3. Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care;J Jardine;BJOG,2021

4. Parental perceptions of the impact of neonatal unit visitation policies during COVID-19 pandemic;H Maniraman;BMJ Paediatrics Open,2020

5. Experiences of breastfeeding during COVID-19: Lesson for future practical and emotional support;A Brown;Matern Child Nutr,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3