Persuadable voters decided the 2022 midterm: Abortion rights and issues-based frameworks for studying election outcomes

Author:

Kann ClaudiaORCID,Ebanks DanielORCID,Morrier Jacob,Alvarez R. MichaelORCID

Abstract

Leading up to the 2022 Congressional midterm elections, all predictions pointed to a Republican wave, given factors such as the incumbent president’s low approval rate and a struggling national economy. Accordingly, the underwhelming performance of the Republican Party surprised many, resulting in an election that became known as the “asterisk election” due to its unusual and seemingly unpredictable outcome. This study delves into the specifics of the 2022 midterms, exploring factors that may have influenced the results beyond those traditionally considered by political scientists. Our analysis particularly seeks to understand whether a sudden shift in the public salience of specific issues could have influenced voters’ preferences, leading them to consider factors they might not have otherwise. To achieve this, we analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of registered voters surveyed immediately after the midterm elections. Our findings reveal that the issue of abortion played a pivotal role during this election. The prominence of abortion was not predestined, as evidenced by a comparative analysis with data from a survey conducted after the 2020 presidential election. Indeed, it seems that the decision by the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade in June 2022 significantly increased the salience of abortion. This unexpected policy shock had a significant impact on the behavior of voters in the 2022 midterm elections.

Funder

The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation

Resnick Sustainability Institute for Science, Energy and Sustainability, California Institute of Technology

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference39 articles.

1. Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964;GH Kramer;American Political Science Review,1971

2. Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections;ER Tufte;American Political Science Review,1975

3. Extreme Referendum: Donald Trump and the 2018 Midterm Elections;GC Jacobson;Political Science Quarterly,2019

4. Edsall TB. the Left-Right Divide Might Help Democrats Avoid a Total Wipeout. New York Times. 2022; https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/26/opinion/democrats-midterms-polarization.html.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3