Optimising primary molecular profiling in non-small cell lung cancer

Author:

Schouten R. D.ORCID,Schouten I.,Schuurbiers M. M. F.ORCID,van der Noort V.ORCID,Damhuis R. A. M.,van der Heijden E. H. F. M.ORCID,Burgers J. A.ORCID,Barlo N. P.,van Lindert A. S. R.,Maas K. W.,van den Brand J. J. G.,Smit A. A. J.,van Haarst J. M. W.,van der Maat B.ORCID,Schuuring E.ORCID,Blaauwgeers H.,Willems S. M.,Monkhorst K.,van den Broek D.ORCID,van den Heuvel M. M.ORCID

Abstract

Introduction Molecular profiling of NSCLC is essential for optimising treatment decisions, but often incomplete. We assessed the efficacy of protocolised molecular profiling in the current standard-of-care (SoC) in a prospective observational study in the Netherlands and measured the effect of providing standardised diagnostic procedures. We also explored the potential of plasma-based molecular profiling in the primary diagnostic setting. Methods This multi-centre prospective study was designed to explore the performance of current clinical practice during the run-in phase using local SoC tissue profiling procedures. The subsequent phase was designed to investigate the extent to which comprehensive molecular profiling (CMP) can be maximized by protocolising tumour profiling. Successful molecular profiling was defined as completion of at least EGFR and ALK testing. Additionally, PD-L1 tumour proportions scores were explored. Lastly, the additional value of centralised plasma-based testing for EGFR and KRAS mutations using droplet digital PCR was evaluated. Results Total accrual was 878 patients, 22.0% had squamous cell carcinoma and 78.0% had non-squamous NSCLC. Stage I-III was seen in 54.0%, stage IV in 46.0%. Profiling of EGFR and ALK was performed in 69.9% of 136 patients included in the run-in phase, significantly more than real-world data estimates of 55% (p<0.001). Protocolised molecular profiling increased the rate to 77.0% (p = 0.049). EGFR and ALK profiling rates increased from 77.9% to 82.1% in non-squamous NSCLC and from 43.8% to 57.5% in squamous NSCLC. Plasma-based testing was feasible in 98.4% and identified oncogenic driver mutations in 7.1% of patients for whom tissue profiling was unfeasible. Conclusion This study shows a high success rate of tissue-based molecular profiling that was significantly improved by a protocolised approach. Tissue-based profiling remains unfeasible for a substantial proportion of patients. Combined analysis of tumour tissue and circulating tumour DNA is a promising approach to allow adequate molecular profiling of more patients.

Funder

Merck Sharp and Dohme

AstraZeneca

Novartis

Pfizer

Roche

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference26 articles.

1. Dutch Oncoline Guidelines, version 2.3;IK Nederland,2015

2. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.;S Novello;Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol.,2016

3. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.;D Planchard;Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol.,2018

4. OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base.;D Chakravarty;JCO Precis Oncol,2017

5. Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer;Y-L Wu;N Engl J Med,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3