Abstract
This study is aimed at investigating the asymmetric and time-frequency co-movements and the hedge or safe-haven properties of carbon efficient indices, the MSCI ACWI Sustainable Impact, and MSCI World EGS indices, in relation to technology and innovation-themed investments. In doing so, the ADCC-GJR-GARCH and wavelet coherence techniques are applied to a daily return series ranging from January 2019 to January 2023. Findings of the ADCC-GJR-GARCH model show negative and insignificant asymmetric linkage among underlying indices during the sample period. The S&P 500 carbon efficient index (CEI) acts as a strong hedge or safe-haven for technology and innovation-themed indices during tranquil and tumultuous periods. The MSCI ACWI Sustainable Impact, MSCI World EGS, and carbon efficient indices except for S&P 500 CEI exhibit weak hedge or safe-haven attributes. Wavelet coherence reveals negative (positive) co-movements between the thematic and carbon efficient indices in short-term (medium-term and long-term) horizons with consistent leading behavior of thematic indices to carbon efficient indices outcomes. It justifies the presence of short-lived hedging or safe-haven characteristics in the thematic domain for investors. These strong and weak hedge or safe-haven characteristics of low carbon and sustainability indices reveal that adding low carbon efficient and sustainable investments to a portfolio result in considerable diversification benefits for investors who tend to take minimal risk in both tranquil and tumultuous periods. The current findings imply that financial institutions, thematic investing companies, and governments need to encourage carbon efficient technology transfer and innovation-themed investments by increasing the fund allocations in underlying asset classes. Policy-making and regulatory bodies can encourage investors to make carbon-efficient and thematic investments and companies to issue carbon-efficient stocks or investments to safeguard social and economic risks during fragile periods. These investments can offer greater opportunities to combat the intensity of economic shocks on portfolios for responsible or sustainable investors.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
National Social Science Foundation
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference68 articles.
1. NOAA. Greenhouse gases continued to increase rapidly in 2022; Carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide rise further into uncharted levels. In: Commerce UDo, editor. 2023.
2. GCP. Global Carbon Budget 2022 2022 [Available from: https://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/22/presentation.htm.
3. Are green bonds and sustainable cryptocurrencies truly sustainable? Evidence from a wavelet coherence analysis;IU Haq;Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja,2023
4. Impact of digital technology on carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese cities;Y Shen;Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,2023