What do users and their aiding professionals want from future devices in upper limb prosthetics? A focus group study

Author:

Einfeldt Ann-KathrinORCID,Rebmann Franziska,Yao Dawei,Stukenborg-Colsmann Christina,Hurschler Christof,Windhagen Henning,Jakubowitz EikeORCID

Abstract

Background High rejection rates of upper limb prosthetics indicate that current prosthetic devices only partially meet user demands. This study therefore investigated the benefits and challenges with current prostheses, associated services and potential areas for improvement from the perspective of upper limb prosthesis users and various professionals working in the field of upper limb and hand prosthetics. Methods and findings Seven different focus group discussions were conducted with 32 participants. Participants were grouped by prosthesis type, if they were prosthesis users, or professionals. All focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim, and a summarizing content analysis was performed. Three main topic areas to be addressed emerged from the interviews: 1. a properly functioning prosthesis, 2. the infrastructure, and 3. users’ psychological and physical prerequisites. The interaction between a well-functioning prosthesis and a well-developed infrastructure was shown to be important for successful use. Conclusions Our study raises many of the same issues that have been reported in previous qualitative studies, dating back over several decades. This study underlines the need to include users and professionals in the future development of prosthetic devices.

Funder

Horizon 2020

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference26 articles.

1. Identifying and prioritizing concerns associated with prosthetic devices for use in a benefit-risk assessment: a mixed-methods approach.;EM Janssen;Expert Review of Medical Devices,2018

2. New developments in prosthetic arm systems.;I Vujaklija;ORR,2016

3. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics.;E Biddiss;Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology,2007

4. Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users.;F Cordella;Front. Neurosci,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3