"Factors associated with provider unwillingness to perform induced abortion in Argentina: A cross-sectional study in four provinces following the legalization of abortion on request"

Author:

Vázquez PaulaORCID,Nigri Carolina,Pingray Verónica,Gibbons Luz,Formia Sandra,Messina Analía,Castro Claudia,Jacobi Cintia,Martiarena Adriana,Velazco Susana,Langer Ana,Gausman Jewel,Jolivet R. RimaORCID,Williams Caitlin R.,Berrueta Mabel

Abstract

Background The 2020 Law on Access to the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy is a landmark piece of legislation regarding access to abortion in Argentina. Under the new law, abortion is legal up to 14 weeks and 6 days gestation, with exceptions made to the gestational age limit to save a woman´s life, to preserve a woman´s health, and in case of rape. However, widespread refusal to provide care by authorized health providers (due to conscientious objection or lack of awareness of the new law) could hinder access to legal abortion. This study aimed to assess knowledge of the current legal framework and willingness to perform abortions by authorized professionals in Argentina, to compare perceptions about any requirements necessary to perform abortions on legal grounds between willing and unwilling providers and to explore factors associated with refusal to provide care. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study based on a self-administered, anonymous survey to authorized abortion providers in public health facilities in four provinces of Argentina. Findings Most authorized providers knew the grounds upon which it is currently legal to perform abortions; however, almost half reported being unwilling to perform abortions, mainly due to conscientious objection. Both willing and unwilling providers believed there were additional requirements not actually stipulated by law. Using logistic regression, we found that province where providers serve, working in a tertiary level facility, and older age were factors associated with unwillingness to provide care. Conclusions The results of our study indicate that, even in a favorable legal context, barriers at the provider level may hinder access to abortion in Argentina. They help to demonstrate the need for specific actions that can improve access such as training, further research and public policies that guarantee facilities have sufficient professionals willing to provide abortion care.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference36 articles.

1. Argentina to legalise elective abortion;A. Booth;Lancet,2021

2. Step by step in Argentina: Putting abortion rights into practice.;S Ramos;Int J Womens Health.,2023

3. Between the urgent and the emerging: Representations on sex education in the debate for abortion legalization in Argentina;G. Dvoskin;Front Sociol.,2021

4. Experiencias y obstáculos que enfrentan las mujeres en el acceso al aborto;S Ramos;Centro de estudios de estado y sociedad. CEDES. Buenos Aires. Argentina,2020

5. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model.;B Ganatra;Lancet,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3