Can different variations of suspension exercises provide adequate loads and muscle activations for upper body training?

Author:

Vural Faik,Erman Berkant,Ranisavljev Igor,Yuzbasioglu Yasin,Ćopić NemanjaORCID,Aksit TolgaORCID,Dopsaj Milivoj,Ozkol Mehmet Zeki

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in muscle activation (EMG) and body weight distribution (%BW) between suspension (TRX push-up and TRX inverted row) and conventional exercises (bench press and lying barbell row) using different contraction types (isometric and isotonic) and position variations (feet on the ground [FG] and feet on suspension device [FD]). It was also used to determine the intensity of the force applied to the straps of the suspension device corresponding to one repetition maximum (1-RM). Twelve male athletes (ages—24.5±4.2 years (mean±standard deviation [SD]); Height—181.0±6.8 cm; body mass—83.08±6.81 kg) participated in this study. Two suspension devices were used, one for the FD variation and one for the FG variation pectoralis major (PM) and triceps brachii (TRI) activations were assessed during the TRX push-up and bench press exercises. Transversus trapezius (TRA) and biceps brachii (BB) activations were assessed during the TRX inverted row and lying barbell row exercises. The results showed significant differences between exercises (FG and FD variations of TRX push-up and bench press) in PM activities (isometric and isotonic) (p≤0.05). However, these differences were only observed during isometric TRI activation (p≤0.05). In the FG and FD variations of the TRX inverted row and lying barbell row exercises, there were only differences in the isometric contractions of the TRA and BB (p≤0.05). In the suspension device of push-ups and inverted row for the FD variations, 70.5% and 72.64% of 1-RM intensity were obtained, respectively. Similar responses to training intensities and muscle activations can be obtained in suspension exercises and conventional exercises. FD variations of suspension exercises can be more effective in terms of muscle activations than FG variations, and isotonic suspension exercises increase exercise intensity more than isometric suspension exercises.

Funder

Scientific Research Projects Coordination of Ege University

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference25 articles.

1. Muscle activation in suspension training: a systematic review;J Aguilera-Castells;Sports Biomechanics,2020

2. Kinetic analysis of push-up exercises: a systematic review with practical recommendations;W Dhahbi;Sports Biomechanics,2018

3. Muscular contribution to low-back loading and stiffness during standard and suspended push-ups;TA Beach;Human Movement Science,2008

4. Muscle activity levels in upper-body push exercises with different loads and stability conditions;J Calatayud;The Physician and Sportsmedicine,2014

5. Muscle activation during push-ups with different suspension training systems;J Calatayud;Journal ofSports Science & Medicine,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3