Female genital mutilation and safer sex negotiation among women in sexual unions in sub-Saharan Africa: Analysis of demographic and health survey data

Author:

Aboagye Richard GyanORCID,Ahinkorah Bright Opoku,Seidu Abdul-Aziz,Frimpong James BoaduORCID,Adu CollinsORCID,Hagan John Elvis,Ahmed Salma A. E.ORCID,Yaya SanniORCID

Abstract

Background The practice of female genital mutilation is associated with harmful social norms promoting violence against girls and women. Various studies have been conducted to examine the prevalence of female genital mutilation and its associated factors. However, there has been limited studies conducted to assess the association between female genital mutilation and markers of women’s autonomy, such as their ability to negotiate for safer sex. In this study, we examined the association between female genital mutilation and women’s ability to negotiate for safer sex in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Methods We pooled data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted from 2010 to 2020. Data from a sample of 50,337 currently married and cohabiting women from eleven sub-Saharan African countries were included in the study. A multilevel binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between female genital mutilation and women’s ability to refuse sex and ask their partners to use condom. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to present the findings of the logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results Female genital mutilation was performed on 56.1% of women included in our study. The highest and lowest prevalence of female genital mutilation were found among women from Guinea (96.3%) and Togo (6.9%), respectively. We found that women who had undergone female genital mutilation were less likely to refuse sex from their partners (aOR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86, 0.96) and ask their partners to use condoms (aOR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.86) compared to those who had not undergone female genital mutilation. Conclusion Female genital mutilation hinders women’s ability to negotiate for safer sex. It is necessary to implement health education and promotion interventions (e.g., decision making skills) that assist women who have experienced female genital mutilation to negotiate for safer sex. These interventions are crucial to enhance sexual health outcomes for these women. Further, strict enforcement of policies and laws aimed at eradicating the practice of female genital mutilation are encouraged to help contribute to the improvement of women’s reproductive health.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference39 articles.

1. UNICEF. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A global concern. UNICEF, New York. 2016. www.unicef.org/media/files/FGMC_2016_brochure_final_UNICEF_SPREAD.pdf.

2. World Health Organization. Female Genital Mutilation Hurts Women and Economies. 2020. https://www.who.int/news/item/06-02-2020-female-genital-mutilation-hurts-women-and-economies#:~:text=Treating%20female%20genital%20mutilation%20costs%20USD%201.4%20billion%20per%20year%20globally:%20WHO&text=Female%20genital%20mutilation%20(FGM)%20exacts,World%20Health%20Organization%20(WHO).

3. United Nation Population Fund. Women and girls, aged 15–49, who have undergone some form of FGM. 2020.

4. Ganiyu O Shakirat, Muhammad A Alshibshoubi, Eldia Delia, Anam Hamayon, Ian H Rutkofsky. Overview of Female Genital Mutilation in Africa: Are the Women Beneficiaries or Victims? 2020. PMCID: PMC7536110

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3