Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?

Author:

Glynn JoelORCID,Jones Timothy,Bell Mike,Blazeby Jane,Burton Christopher,Conefrey Carmel,Donovan Jenny L.,Farrar Nicola,Morley JosieORCID,McNair AngusORCID,Owen-Smith Amanda,Rule Ellen,Thornton Gail,Tucker Victoria,Williams IestynORCID,Rooshenas Leila,Hollingworth William

Abstract

Background Health systems are under pressure to maintain services within limited resources. The Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme published a first list of guidelines in 2019, which aimed to reduce inappropriate use of interventions within the NHS in England, reducing potential harm and optimising the use of limited resources. Seventeen procedures were selected in the first round, published in April 2019. Methods We evaluated changes in the trends for each procedure after its inclusion in the EBI’s first list of guidelines using interrupted time series analysis. We explored whether there was any evidence of spill-over effects onto related or substitute procedures, as well as exploring changes in geographical variation following the publication of national guidance. Results Most procedures were experiencing downward trends in the years prior to the launch of EBI. We found no evidence of a trend change in any of the 17 procedures following the introduction of the guidance. No evidence of spill-over increases in substitute or related procedures was found. Geographic variation in the number of procedures performed across English CCGs remained at similar levels before and after EBI. Conclusions The EBI programme had little success in its aim to further reduce the use of the 17 procedures it deemed inappropriate in all or certain circumstances. Most procedure rates were already decreasing before EBI and all continued with a similar trend afterwards. Geographical variation in the number of procedures remained at a similar level post EBI. De-adoption of inappropriate care is essential in maintaining health systems across the world. However, further research is needed to explore context specific enablers and barriers to effective identification and de-adoption of such inappropriate health care to support future de-adoption endeavours.

Funder

Health and Social Care Delivery Research

National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference37 articles.

1. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans;COVID Surg Collaborative;British Journal of Surgery,2020

2. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review;DJ Niven;BMC Med,2015

3. Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation;EW Verkerk;IInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care,2018

4. Common elective orthopaedic procedures and their clinical effectiveness: umbrella review of level 1 evidence;AW Blom;BMJ,2021

5. Explaining the absence of surgical procedure regulation;JJ Darrow;Cornell J Law Public Policy,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3