Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?
Author:
Glynn JoelORCID,
Jones Timothy,
Bell Mike,
Blazeby Jane,
Burton Christopher,
Conefrey Carmel,
Donovan Jenny L.,
Farrar Nicola,
Morley JosieORCID,
McNair AngusORCID,
Owen-Smith Amanda,
Rule Ellen,
Thornton Gail,
Tucker Victoria,
Williams IestynORCID,
Rooshenas Leila,
Hollingworth William
Abstract
Background
Health systems are under pressure to maintain services within limited resources. The Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme published a first list of guidelines in 2019, which aimed to reduce inappropriate use of interventions within the NHS in England, reducing potential harm and optimising the use of limited resources. Seventeen procedures were selected in the first round, published in April 2019.
Methods
We evaluated changes in the trends for each procedure after its inclusion in the EBI’s first list of guidelines using interrupted time series analysis. We explored whether there was any evidence of spill-over effects onto related or substitute procedures, as well as exploring changes in geographical variation following the publication of national guidance.
Results
Most procedures were experiencing downward trends in the years prior to the launch of EBI. We found no evidence of a trend change in any of the 17 procedures following the introduction of the guidance. No evidence of spill-over increases in substitute or related procedures was found. Geographic variation in the number of procedures performed across English CCGs remained at similar levels before and after EBI.
Conclusions
The EBI programme had little success in its aim to further reduce the use of the 17 procedures it deemed inappropriate in all or certain circumstances. Most procedure rates were already decreasing before EBI and all continued with a similar trend afterwards. Geographical variation in the number of procedures remained at a similar level post EBI. De-adoption of inappropriate care is essential in maintaining health systems across the world. However, further research is needed to explore context specific enablers and barriers to effective identification and de-adoption of such inappropriate health care to support future de-adoption endeavours.
Funder
Health and Social Care Delivery Research
National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference37 articles.
1. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans;COVID Surg Collaborative;British Journal of Surgery,2020
2. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review;DJ Niven;BMC Med,2015
3. Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation;EW Verkerk;IInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care,2018
4. Common elective orthopaedic procedures and their clinical effectiveness: umbrella review of level 1 evidence;AW Blom;BMJ,2021
5. Explaining the absence of surgical procedure regulation;JJ Darrow;Cornell J Law Public Policy,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献