Abstract
The ideological dispute between left and right has dominated the political discussion for decades in multiple countries across the globe. However, in recent years people vs. elite debates have replaced traditional ideological conflicts in explaining voters’ electoral decisions. In this paper, we investigate whether anti-elite attitudes contribute to a key political outcome: the increase in successful independent candidates. We implement a conjoint experiment in Chile, where anti-elite sentiments and the number of successful independent politicians are currently prominent. We find that preferences for independent candidates largely increase among voters with anti-elite orientations. In a context where traditional parties face difficult times, such beliefs are key to understanding the factors behind support for candidates with no party affiliation. This insight is important because electing independent politicians can promote a personalistic style of politics, undermine democratic accountability, and foster conflict between the executive and legislative branches.
Funder
College of Liberal Arts, Purdue University
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference44 articles.
1. Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America;C Mudde;Government and opposition,2013
2. Hawkins K, Carlin R, Littvay L, Rovira C. The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis Routledge, 2018.
3. Spain: No country for the populist radical right?;S Alonso;South European Society and Politics,2015
4. Ruth S, Hawkins K. Populism and democratic representation in Latin America 2017.
5. Rural rage: the roots of right-wing populism in the United States;C Berlet;The Journal of Peasant Studies,2019