The burden of stillbirths in low resource settings in Latin America: Evidence from a network using an electronic surveillance system
Author:
de Mucio BremenORCID, Sosa Claudio, Colomar Mercedes, Mainero Luis, Cruz Carmen M., Chévez Luz M., Lopez Rita, Carrillo Gema, Rizo Ulises, Saint Hillaire Erika E., Arriaga William E., Guadalupe Flores Rosa M., Ochoa Carlos, Gonzalez Freddy, Castro RigobertoORCID, Stefan Allan, Moreno Amanda, Metelus SherlyORCID, Souza Renato T., Costa Maria L., Luz Adriana G.ORCID, Sousa Maria H., Cecatti José G.ORCID, Serruya Suzanne J.ORCID
Abstract
Objective
To determine stillbirth ratio and its association with maternal, perinatal, and delivery characteristics, as well as geographic differences in Latin American countries (LAC).
Methods
We analysed data from the Perinatal Information System of the Latin American Center for Perinatology and Human Development (CLAP) between January 2018 and June 2021 in 8 health facilities from five LAC countries (Bolivia, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic). Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics, in addition to pregnancy outcomes were reported. Estimates of association were tested using chi-square tests, and P < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Bivariate analysis was conducted to estimate stillbirth risk. Prevalence ratios (PR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each predictor were reported.
Results
In total, 101,852 childbirths comprised the SIP database. For this analysis, we included 99,712 childbirths. There were 762 stillbirths during the study period; the Stillbirth ratio of 7.7/1,000 live births (ranged from 3.8 to 18.2/1,000 live births across the different maternities); 586 (76.9%) were antepartum stillbirths, 150 (19.7%) were intrapartum stillbirths and 26 (3.4%) with an ignored time of death. Stillbirth was significantly associated with women with diabetes (PRadj 2.36; 95%CI [1.25–4.46]), preeclampsia (PRadj 2.01; 95%CI [1.26–3.19]), maternal age (PRadj 1.04; 95%CI [1.02–1.05]), any medical condition (PRadj 1.48; 95%CI [1.24–1.76, and severe maternal outcome (PRadj 3.27; 95%CI [3.27–11.66]).
Conclusions
Pregnancy complications and maternal morbidity were significantly associated with stillbirths. The stillbirth ratios varied across the maternity hospitals, which highlights the importance for individual surveillance. Specialized antenatal and intrapartum care remains a priority, particularly for women who are at a higher risk of stillbirth.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference44 articles.
1. for The Lancet’s Stillbirths Series steering committee. Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?;JE Lawn;Lancet,2011 2. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis.;Lancet Stillbirth Epidemiology Investigator Group;Lancet Glob Health,2016 3. Global, regional, and national under-5 mortality, adult mortality, age-specific mortality, and life expectancy, 1970–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.;GBD 2016 Mortality Collaborators;Lancet 4. Stillbirths: progress and unfinished business;JF Frøen;Lancet,2016 5. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030;J Lawn;Lancet,2016
|
|