Physiological and clinical effects of low-intensity blood-flow restricted resistance exercise compared to standard rehabilitation in adults with knee osteoarthritis–Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Author:

Sørensen BrianORCID,Aagaard PerORCID,Hjortshøj Mikkel H.ORCID,Hansen Sofie K.,Suetta Charlotte,Couppé Christian,Magnusson S. Peter,Johannsen Finn E.

Abstract

Introduction Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease with high socioeconomical costs. In Denmark, standard rehabilitation (SR) consists of a combination of patient education and supervised physical exercise involving a standardized neuromuscular training program. As an evidence-based alternative, high–load (>70% 1RM) resistance training (HIRT) has shown positive rehabilitation effects in knee-OA but may not be tolerated in all patients (~25%) due to knee joint pain. However, low-load resistance training (20–40% 1RM) with concurrent partial blood-flow restriction (BFR) appears to produce effects similar to HIRT yet involving reduced joint pain during and after exercise. The aim is to examine the effect of low-load BFR training compared to SR on pain, thigh muscle mass and muscle function in adults with knee-OA. We hypothesize that 12 weeks of BFR will lead to superior improvements in pain, muscle mass and mechanical muscle function compared to SR. Methods and analysis 90 participants diagnosed with radiographic knee-OA will be randomized to either BFR or SR twice a week for 12 weeks. BFR will consist of two selected lower limb strength exercises performed with an inflated pneumatic occlusion cuff. Intervention procedures in SR consist of a full 8 weeks GLA:D course followed by 4 weeks of team group training. Primary outcome variable is the change in KOOS-Pain subscale from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcome variables are changes in pain sensitivity, functional performance, muscle mass and mechanical muscle function. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses will be conducted. One-way analysis of variance will be performed to evaluate between-group changes. Pre-to-post intervention comparisons will be analyzed using a mixed linear model. Regression analysis will be performed to evaluate potential associations between selected outcome variables.

Funder

The A.P. Moller Foundation

The Health Foundation

The Danish Rheumatism Association

The Physiotherapy Practice Foundation

Foundation of the National Health Security System (Fonden for Faglig Udvikling af Speciallægepraksis)

The Aase and Ejnar Danielsen's Foundation

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference101 articles.

1. Danskernes Sundhed—Den Nationale Sundhedsprofil 2021.;H Jensen;Sundhedsstyrelsen,2022

2. De samfundsmæssige omkostninger ved artrose.;N Johnsen;Statens Institut for Folkesundhed.,2014

3. The pathophysiology of osteoarthritis;Z Ashkavand;Journal of Pharmacy Research,2013

4. Current evidence on risk factors for knee osteoarthritis in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis;V Silverwood;Osteoarthritis and cartilage,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3