‘Integrating Ethics and Equity with Economics and Effectiveness for newborn screening in the genomic age: A qualitative study protocol of stakeholder perspectives

Author:

Kariyawasam Didu S.ORCID,Scarfe Joanne,Meagher Christian,Farrar Michelle A.,Bhattacharya KaustavORCID,Carter Stacy M.,Newson Ainsley J.ORCID,Otlowski Margaret,Watson Jo,Millis Nicole,Norris Sarah

Abstract

Background Newborn bloodspot screening is a well-established population health initiative that detects serious, childhood-onset, treatable conditions to improve health outcomes. With genomic technologies advancing rapidly, many countries are actively discussing the introduction of genomic assays into newborn screening programs. While adding genomic testing to Australia’s newborn screening program could improve outcomes for infants and families, it must be considered against potential harms, ethical, legal, equity and social implications, and economic and health system impacts. We must ask not only ‘can’ we use genomics to screen newborns?’ but ‘should we’?’ and ‘how much should health systems invest in genomic newborn screening?’. Methods This study will use qualitative methods to explore understanding, priorities, concerns and expectations of genomic newborn screening among parents/carers, health professionals/scientists, and health policy makers across Australia. In-depth, semi-structured interviews will be held with 30–40 parents/carers recruited via hospital and community settings, 15–20 health professionals/scientists, and 10–15 health policy makers. Data will be analysed using inductive content analysis. The Sydney Children’s Hospital Network Human Research Ethics Committee approved this study protocol [2023/ETH02371]. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research will guide study planning, conduct and reporting. Discussion Few studies have engaged a diverse range of stakeholders to explore the implications of genomics in newborn screening in a culturally and genetically diverse population, nor in a health system underpinned by universal health care. As the first study within a multi-part research program, findings will be used to generate new knowledge on the risks and benefits and importance of ethical, legal, social and equity implications of genomic newborn screening from the perspective of key stakeholders. As such it will be the foundation on which child and family centered criteria can be developed to inform health technology assessments and drive efficient and effective policy decision-making on the implementation of genomics in newborn screening.

Funder

The Commonwealth of Australia Medical Research Future Fund

Centre of Excellence in Future Low-Energy Electronics Technologies, Australian Research Council

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference52 articles.

1. From public health emergency to public health service: the implications of evolving criteria for newborn screening panels;SD Grosse;Pediatrics,2006

2. A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for severe genetic diseases;SF Kingsmore;American journal of human genetics,2022

3. What Genomic Sequencing Can Offer Universal Newborn Screening Programs;CM Powell;The Hastings Center report,2018

4. How many rare diseases are there?;M Haendel;Nature reviews Drug discovery,2020

5. Australian Bureau of Statistics Australian Demographic Statistics Dec 2018, cat. no. 3101.0. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3101.0.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3