Patient education and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation preferences of patients and providers in COVID care

Author:

Borre Ethan D.,Maciejewski Matthew L.ORCID,Fink Arlene,Burnside Melissa,Purves J. Todd,Scales Charles D.ORCID,Fan Eddy,Sandhu Bhawandip,Pignone Kevin,Palmer Caroline,Webb Carrington,Guggenheim Dana S.,Zhang Yuqi

Abstract

Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents an important but limited treatment for patients with severe COVID-19. We assessed the effects of an educational intervention on a person’s ECMO care preference and examined whether patients and providers had similar ECMO preferences. Methods In the Video+Survey group, patients watched an educational video about ECMO’s purpose, benefits, and risks followed by an assessment of ECMO knowledge and care preferences in seven scenarios varying by hypothetical patient age, function, and comorbidities. Patients in the Survey Only group and providers didn’t watch the video. Logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of agreement for each ECMO scenario between the two patient groups and then between all patients and providers. Results Video+Survey patients were more likely (64% vs. 17%; p = 0.02) to correctly answer all ECMO knowledge questions than Survey Only patients. Patients in both groups agreed that ECMO should be considered across all hypothetical scenarios, with predicted agreement above 65%. In adjusted analyses, patients and providers had similar predicted agreement for ECMO consideration across six of the seven scenarios, but patients showed greater preference (84% vs. 41%, p = 0.003) for the scenario of a functionally dependent 65-year-old with comorbidities than providers. Discussion and conclusions An educational video increased a person’s ECMO knowledge but did not change their ECMO preferences. Clinicians were less likely than patients to recommend ECMO for older adults, so advanced care planning discussion between patients and providers about treatment options in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is critical.

Funder

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Health Services Research and Development

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference22 articles.

1. Prevention CfDCa. United States COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by State: CDC; 2020 [cited 2020 December 5]. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days.

2. The COVID-19 Pandemic and the $16 Trillion Virus;DM Cutler;JAMA,2020

3. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Resource Planning in the Setting of Pandemic Respiratory Illness;R Seethala;Ann Am Thorac Soc,2020

4. Clinical characteristics of 1327 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the largest Fangcang shelter hospital in Wuhan;C Lu;Chin Med J (Engl),2020

5. The Rationing of a Last-Resort Covid Treatment;S. Fink;The New York Times,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3