Abstract
Kale is a nutrient-dense leafy vegetable associated with wide-ranging health benefits. It is tolerant of drought and temperature fluctuations, and could thus serve an increasingly important role in providing a safe and nutritious food supply during the climate crisis, while kale’s ease of cultivation and ability to be grown in a wide range of soils make it a good fit for urban agriculture. In this pilot study we explored potential differences between kale grown at urban versus rural farms. We planted kale seedlings (Darkibor variety) at three urban and four rural farms in and around Baltimore City, Maryland, instructed farmers to cultivate them using their usual growing practices, harvested the kale from fields and points of distribution, and analyzed it for concentrations of carotenoids, vitamins C and K1, ten nutritional elements, and eight non-essential metals. Although sample sizes for some analyses were in some cases too small to produce statistically significant results, we identified potentially meaningful differences in concentrations of several components between urban and rural kale samples. Compared to urban samples, mean concentrations of carotenoids and vitamins were 22–38% higher in rural field samples. By contrast, mean concentrations for eight nutritional elements were higher in urban field samples by as much as 413% for iron. Compared to rural field samples, mean concentrations of nine non-essential metals were higher in urban samples, although lead and cadmium concentrations for all samples were below public health guidelines. Some urban-rural differences were more pronounced than those identified in prior research. For six elements, variance within urban and rural farms was greater than variance between urban and rural farms, suggesting urbanicity may not be the primary driver of some observed differences. For some nutrients, mean concentrations were higher than upper ranges reported in prior estimates, suggesting kale may have the potential to be more nutrient-dense than previously estimated. The nutritive and metals composition of this important crop, and the factors that influence it, merit continued investigation given its growing popularity.
Funder
Agricultural Research Service
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference65 articles.
1. Kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) as a superfood: Review of the scientific evidence behind the statement;D Šamec;Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. Taylor and Francis Inc,2019
2. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service. Kale, raw. In: Fooddata Central [Internet]. 2019 [cited 21 Jul 2023]. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/323505/nutrients
3. United States Food and Drug Administration. Daily Value and Percent Daily Value: Changes on the New Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels. 2020 Mar. Available: Food and Drug Administration of the United States of America
4. Phytochemicals of Brassicaceae in plant protection and human health—Influences of climate, environment and agronomic practice;M Björkman;Phytochemistry,2011
5. Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. Kale. In: The Nutrition Source [Internet]. 2022 [cited 19 Jan 2022]. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/food-features/kale/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献