Assessing community-level impacts of and responses to stay at home orders: The King County COVID-19 community study

Author:

Moloney KathleenORCID,Lamprea Montealegre Julio A.,Busch Isaksen Tania M.,Kennedy Mallory,Archer Megan,Contreras Carlos,Iyaz Daaniya,Randazza Juliette,Silva Javier,Errett Nicole A.ORCID

Abstract

Background At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) of unprecedented scope and duration were implemented to limit community spread of COVID-19. There remains limited evidence about how these measures impacted the lived experience of affected communities. This study captured the early impacts and coping strategies implemented in King County, Washington, one of the first U.S. communities impacted by COVID-19. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of 793 English- and Spanish-speaking adult King County residents from March 18, 2020 –May 30, 2020, using voluntary response sampling. The survey included close- and open-ended questions on participant demographics, wellbeing, protective actions, and COVID-19-related concerns, including a freeform narrative response to describe the pandemic’s individual-, family- and community-level impacts and associated coping strategies. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze close-ended questions, and qualitative content analysis methods were used to analyze free-form narrative responses. Results The median age of participants was 45 years old, and 74% were female, 82% were White, and 6% were Hispanic/Latinx; 474 (60%) provided a qualitative narrative. Quantitative findings demonstrated that higher percentages of participants engaged in most types of COVID-19 protective behaviors after the stay-at-home order was implemented and schools and community spaces were closed, relative to before, and that participants tended to report greater concern about the pandemic’s physical health or healthcare access impacts than the financial or social impacts. Qualitative data analysis described employment or financial impacts (56%) and vitality coping strategies (65%), intended to support health or positive functioning. Conclusions This study documented early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the NPIs implemented in response, as well as strategies employed to cope with those impacts, which can inform early-stage policy formation and intervention strategies to mitigate the negative impacts. Future research should explore the endurance and evolution of the early impacts and coping strategies throughout the multiyear pandemic.

Funder

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference54 articles.

1. The intersection of COVID-19 and mental health;The Lancet Infectious Diseases;Lancet Infect Dis,2020

2. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: An international study;AT Gloster;PLoS One,2020

3. Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the roll out of covid-19 vaccines;Y Zhang;BMJ,2021

4. A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker);T Hale;Nat Hum Behav,2021

5. Stay at Home Orders: What is an “Essential Business”?;MultiState Associates;In: MultiState,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3