Abstract
A growing threat to male infertility has become a major concern for the human population due to the advent of modern technologies as a source of radiofrequency radiation (RFR). Since these technologies have become an integral part of our daily lives, thus, it becomes necessary to know the impression of such radiations on human health. In view of this, the current study aims to focus on the biological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiations on mouse Leydig cell line (TM3) in a time-dependent manner. TM3 cells were exposed to RFR emitted from 4G cell phone and also exposed to a particular frequency of 1800 MHz and 2450 MHz from RFR exposure system. The cells were then evaluated for different parameters such as cell viability, cell proliferation, testosterone production, and ROS generation. A considerable reduction in the testosterone levels and proliferation rate of TM3 cells were observed at 120 min of exposure as compared to the control group in all exposure settings. Conversely, the intracellular ROS levels showed a significant rise at 60, 90 and 120 min of exposure in both mobile phone and 2450 MHz exposure groups. However, RFR treatment for different time durations (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min) did not have significant effect on cell viability at any of the exposure condition (2450 MHz, 1800 MHz, and mobile phone radiation). Therefore, our findings concluded with the negative impact of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiations on Leydig cell’s physiological functions, which could be a serious concern for male infertility. However, additional studies are required to determine the specific mechanism of RFR action as well as its long-term consequences.
Funder
Indian Council of Medical Research
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference49 articles.
1. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).;International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection;Health physics,2020
2. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.;IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans;IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans,2013
3. Non-ionizing radiation as possible carcinogen;S. Gupta;International journal of environmental health research,2020
4. Association between reproductive health and nonionizing radiation exposure;P. Negi;Electromagnetic biology and medicine,2021
5. Radiofrequency radiation: A possible threat to male fertility.;H. Yadav;Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.),,2021