Abstract
Objectives
To explore local induction of labour pathways in the UK National Health Service to provide insight into current practice.
Design
National survey.
Setting
Hospital maternity services in all four nations of the UK.
Sample
Convenience sample of 71 UK maternity units.
Methods
An online cross-sectional survey was disseminated and completed via a national network of obstetrics and gynaecology specialist trainees (October 2021-March 2022). Results were analysed descriptively, with associations explored using Fisher’s Exact and ANOVA.
Main outcome measures
Induction rates, criteria, processes, delays, incidents, safety concerns.
Results
54/71 units responded (76%, 35% of UK units). Induction rate range 19.2%-53.4%, median 36.3%. 72% (39/54) had agreed induction criteria: these varied widely and were not all in national guidance. Multidisciplinary booking decision-making was not reported by 38/54 (70%). Delays reported ‘often/always’ in hospital admission for induction (19%, 10/54) and Delivery Suite transfer once induction in progress (63%, 34/54). Staffing was frequently reported cause of delay (76%, 41/54 ‘often/always’). Delays triggered incident reports in 36/54 (67%) and resulted in harm in 3/54 (6%). Induction was an area of concern (44%, 24/54); 61% (33/54) reported induction-focused quality improvement work.
Conclusions
There is substantial variation in induction rates, processes and policies across UK maternity services. Delays appear to be common and are a cause of safety concerns. With induction rates likely to increase, improved guidance and pathways are critically needed to improve safety and experience of care.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West Midlands
Medical Research Council
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference45 articles.
1. National Maternity & Perinatal Audit. Clinical audit results–maternity service comparisons 2019 [https://maternityaudit.org.uk/Audit/Charting/ClinicalByMeasure].
2. Global Perspectives on Elective Induction of Labor;J Vogel;Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology,2014
3. Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study;A Seijmonsbergen-Schermers;PLoS Med,2020
4. Prevention UCfDCa. Births data summary: natality 1995–2020 2022 [https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality.html].
5. National Institute for ealth and Clinical Excellence. Induction of labour. London: NICE; 2008.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献