Induction of labour care in the UK: A cross-sectional survey of maternity units

Author:

Taylor BeckORCID,Cross-Sudworth Fiona,Rimmer Michael,Quinn LauraORCID,Morris R. Katie,Johnston Tracey,Morad Sharon,Davidson Louisa,Kenyon Sara,

Abstract

Objectives To explore local induction of labour pathways in the UK National Health Service to provide insight into current practice. Design National survey. Setting Hospital maternity services in all four nations of the UK. Sample Convenience sample of 71 UK maternity units. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was disseminated and completed via a national network of obstetrics and gynaecology specialist trainees (October 2021-March 2022). Results were analysed descriptively, with associations explored using Fisher’s Exact and ANOVA. Main outcome measures Induction rates, criteria, processes, delays, incidents, safety concerns. Results 54/71 units responded (76%, 35% of UK units). Induction rate range 19.2%-53.4%, median 36.3%. 72% (39/54) had agreed induction criteria: these varied widely and were not all in national guidance. Multidisciplinary booking decision-making was not reported by 38/54 (70%). Delays reported ‘often/always’ in hospital admission for induction (19%, 10/54) and Delivery Suite transfer once induction in progress (63%, 34/54). Staffing was frequently reported cause of delay (76%, 41/54 ‘often/always’). Delays triggered incident reports in 36/54 (67%) and resulted in harm in 3/54 (6%). Induction was an area of concern (44%, 24/54); 61% (33/54) reported induction-focused quality improvement work. Conclusions There is substantial variation in induction rates, processes and policies across UK maternity services. Delays appear to be common and are a cause of safety concerns. With induction rates likely to increase, improved guidance and pathways are critically needed to improve safety and experience of care.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West Midlands

Medical Research Council

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference45 articles.

1. National Maternity & Perinatal Audit. Clinical audit results–maternity service comparisons 2019 [https://maternityaudit.org.uk/Audit/Charting/ClinicalByMeasure].

2. Global Perspectives on Elective Induction of Labor;J Vogel;Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology,2014

3. Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study;A Seijmonsbergen-Schermers;PLoS Med,2020

4. Prevention UCfDCa. Births data summary: natality 1995–2020 2022 [https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality.html].

5. National Institute for ealth and Clinical Excellence. Induction of labour. London: NICE; 2008.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3