Abstract
Watersheds require collective care and management at local and regional levels to maintain their ecological health. The Chesapeake Bay’s last several decades of stagnantly poor ecological health presents a distinctive case study for explicating the challenges of motivating collective action across a diverse regional natural resource. Our study uses county- and individual-level descriptive analysis to examine interrelated framings of environmental quality, environmental sentiment, and political action at two critical moments in time—the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. We find that demographic, environmental, and political characteristics vary with distance to the Chesapeake Bay and that linked environmental and political characteristics appeared to become more polarized between 2016 and 2020. We found no evidence that local environmental quality influenced new political actions such as voting; however, people already likely to vote were influenced by their pro-environmental values such as priorities around climate change.
Funder
Penn State, College of Arts & Architecture
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference39 articles.
1. Watershed Management and Public Health: An Exploration of the Intersection of Two Fields as Reported in the Literature from 2000 to 2010;M. J. Bunch;Environ Manage,2014
2. Manson S., Schroeder J., Van Riper D., Kugler T., and Ruggles S., “ IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 17.0 [dataset],” 2022.
3. Factors driving nutrient trends in streams of the Chesapeake Bay watershed;S. W. Ator;J Environ Qual,2020
4. Measuring the Health of the Chesapeake Bay: Toward Integration and Prediction;D. F. Boesch;Environ Res,2000
5. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Studies, “Eco Health Report Cards,” 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献