Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias

Published:2018-04-13 Issue:4 Volume:13 Page:e0195145
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLOS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Campbell Harlan^ORCID,Gustafson Paul

Funder

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference160 articles.

1. Why most published research findings are false;JP Ioannidis;PLoS Medicine,2005

2. Assessing the unreliability of the medical literature: a response to ‘Why most published research findings are false?’;S Goodman;Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biostatistics; working paper,2007

3. Is most published research really false?;JT Leek;Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application,2017

4. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data;D Fanelli;PLoS One,2009

5. Editorial;D Trafimow;Basic and Applied Social Psychology,2015

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is There a Foreign Language Effect on Workplace Bribery Susceptibility? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Vignette Experiment;Journal of Business Ethics;2024-06-13

2. Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?;eLife;2024-05-13

3. Systems for rating bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of air pollution exposure and reproductive and children’s health: a methodological survey;Environmental Health;2024-03-28

4. Replication of “null results” – Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?;2024-02-16

5. Replication of “null results” – Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?;ELIFE;2023-11-22