Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency

Published:2018-05-11 Issue:5 Volume:13 Page:e0196914
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLOS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Shepherd Jonathan^ORCID,Frampton Geoff K.,Pickett Karen,Wyatt Jeremy C.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference107 articles.

1. Peer Review in Health Sciences;F Godlee,2003

2. Gluckman P. Which science to fund: time to review peer review? Auckland: Office of the Prime Minister’s Science Advisory Committee (New Zealand); 2012.

3. Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations’ and grant reviewers’ perspectives;S Schroter;BMC Med,2010

4. Alternatives to Peer Review in Research Project Funding;S Guthrie,2013

5. Bias in peer review;CJ Lee;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Are numerical scores important for grant assessment? A cross-sectional study;F1000Research;2024-09-05

2. Prospects and Importance of Training Needs in Peer Review Models;Scientific Publishing Ecosystem;2024

3. Can cash transfer interventions increase contraceptive use and reduce adolescent birth and pregnancy in low and middle income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysis;PLOS Global Public Health;2023-11-09

4. Are numerical scores important for grant proposals' evaluation? A cross sectional study;F1000Research;2023-09-26

5. Blinding Models for Scientific Peer-Review of Biomedical Research Proposals: A Systematic Review;Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics;2023-08-01