Viewing the US presidential electoral map through the lens of public health

Author:

Hamamsy TymorORCID,Danziger Michael,Nagler Jonathan,Bonneau Richard

Abstract

Health, disease, and mortality vary greatly at the county level, and there are strong geographical trends of disease in the United States. Healthcare is and has been a top priority for voters in the U.S., and an important political issue. Consequently, it is important to determine what relationship voting patterns have with health, disease, and mortality, as doing so may help guide appropriate policy. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between voting patterns and over 150 different public health and wellbeing variables at the county level, comparing all states, including counties in 2016 battleground states, and counties in states that flipped from majority Democrat to majority Republican from 2012 to 2016. We also investigated county-level health trends over the last 30+ years and find statistically significant relationships between a number of health measures and the voting patterns of counties in presidential elections. Collectively, these data exhibit a strong pattern: counties that voted Republican in the 2016 election had overall worse health outcomes than those that voted Democrat. We hope that this strong relationship can guide improvements in healthcare policy legislation at the county level.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference41 articles.

1. Public’s 2019 Priorities: Economy, Health Care, Education and Security All Near Top of List. Pew Research Center—U.S. Politics & Policy. 2019. Available from: https://www.people-press.org/2019/01/24/publics-2019-priorities-economy-health-care-education-and-security-all-near-top-of-list/

2. Health Care in the 2018 Election;RJ Blendon;New England Journal of Medicine,2018

3. Jones B. Republicans and Democrats have grown further apart on what the nation’s top priorities should be. Pew Research Center. 2019. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/05/republicans-and-democrats-have-grown-further-apart-on-what-the-nations-top-priorities-should-be/

4. Brown H. The Democratic debates have spent 93 minutes on health care. Vox. 2019. Available from: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/10/15/20914415/democratic-debates-health-care-issues

5. Health Care in the 2016 Election—A View through Voters’ Polarized Lenses;RJ Blendon;New England Journal of Medicine,2016

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3