Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review protocol using the COSMIN checklist

Author:

Tomacheuski Rubia Mitalli,Monteiro Beatriz Paglerani,Evangelista Marina Cayetano,Luna Stelio Pacca Loureiro,Steagall Paulo ViníciusORCID

Abstract

Society has been increasingly concerned about the impact of pain on farm animal welfare. This systematic review aims to provide evidence relating to the measurement properties (i.e. reliability, validity, and sensitivity) of pain scoring instruments used for pain assessment in farm animals. A literature search will be performed using five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CAB abstracts and Biological Abstracts) and search terms related to pain, pain scales and different species of farm animals. Eligibility criteria will include full-text studies on the development and/or validation of acute and chronic pain scoring instruments for farm animals including bovine (beef and dairy), ovine, caprine, camel, swine and poultry. Exclusion criteria will include studies that report the use of pain scales for the validation of another instrument, or those reporting ethograms/list of behaviors potentially indicating pain without a scoring system. Study titles and their abstracts will be screened for eligibility by one investigator. Full-text articles will be independently reviewed for eligibility and evaluated by two investigators. Relevant information will be recorded and evaluated systematically according to the Consensus‐based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist using an adapted data collection sheet. The following measurement properties and characteristics of the instruments will be assessed: content validity (internal consistency, structural and cross-cultural validity), reliability, measurement error, criterion and construct validity, responsiveness, interpretability and feasibility. Following the assessment of methodological quality and quality of the findings, evidence for each measurement property will be summarized into high, moderate, low or very low. This systematic review will provide further insights into the evidence-based measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals. It may identify possible gaps of knowledge with these tools as a potential target for future studies in farm animals with a positive impact on animal welfare.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil

The São Paulo Research Foundation FAPESP Thematic Projects

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference48 articles.

1. Prioritization of Farm Animal Welfare Issues Using Expert Consensus;FC Rioja-Lang;Front Vet Sci,2020

2. Clinician attitudes to pain and use of analgesia in cattle: where are we 10 years on?;JG Remnant;Vet Rec,2017

3. Current attitudes regarding the use of perioperative analgesics in dogs and cats by Brazilian veterinarians;SE Lorena;Vet Anaesth Analg,2014

4. Factors affecting Canadian veterinarians’ use of analgesics when dehorning beef and dairy calves;CJ Hewson;Can Vet J,2007

5. Pain Detection and Amelioration in Animals on the Farm: Issues and Options;L Anil;J Appl Anim Welf Sci,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3