Experiences, challenges and perspectives for ensuring end-of-life patient care: A national online survey with general practitioners in Germany

Author:

Tielker Jannik M.,Weber Jan P.,Simon Steffen T.,Bausewein Claudia,Stiel StephanieORCID,Schneider Nils

Abstract

Background The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic is posing major challenges for health care systems. In Germany, one such challenge has been that adequate palliative care for the severely ill and dying (with and without COVID-19), as well as their loved ones, has not been available at all times and in all settings., the pandemic has underlined the significance of the contribution of general practitioners (GPs) to the care of severely ill and dying patients. Objectives To describe GPs’ experiences, challenges and perspectives with respect to end-of-life care during the first peak of the pandemic (spring 2020) in Germany. Materials and methods In November and December 2020, a link to an Unipark online survey was sent to GPs registered on nationwide distribution lists. Results In total, 410 GPs responded; 61.5% indicated that the quality of their patients’ end-of-life care was maintained throughout the pandemic, 36.8% reported a decrease in quality compared to pre-pandemic times. Of the GPs who made home visits to severely ill and dying patients, 61.4% reported a stable number of visits, 28.5% reported fewer visits. 62.7% of the GPs reported increased telephone contact and reduced personal contact with patients; 36.1% offered video consultations in lieu of face-to-face contact. The GPs reported that relatives were restricted (48.5%) or prohibited from visiting (33.4%) patients in nursing homes. They observed a fear of loneliness among patients in nursing homes (91.9%), private homes (87.3%) and hospitals (86.1%). Conclusions The present work provides insights into the pandemic management of GPs and supports the development of a national strategy for palliative care during a pandemic. To effectively address end-of-life care, GPs and palliative care specialists should be involved in COVID-19 task forces on micro, meso and macro levels of health care.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference38 articles.

1. AerzteZeitung.de [Internet]. Neu-Isenburg: Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH; c2021 [cited 2021 Mar 31]. SARS-CoV-2: Verständnis für Besuchsverbot in Heimen. [SARS-CoV-2: Understanding for visiting bans to nursing homes.] Available from: https://www.aerztezeitung.de/Politik/SARS-CoV-2-Verstaendnis-fuer-Besuchsverbot-in-Heimen-407652.html

2. Robert Koch-Institut [Internet]. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut; c2020 [cited 2021 Mar 31]. Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2—April 2020: Archiv der Situationsberichte des Robert Koch-Instituts zu COVID-19. [Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2—April 2020: Archive of Robert Koch Institute situation reports on COVID-19.] Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/2020-04-02-de.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3