Abstract
In this paper, the Duckworth-Lewis-Stern (DLS) and Duckworth-Lewis-McHale-Asif (DLMA) methods of revising targets for a team batting in second innings in an interrupted Limited Overs International Cricket (LOI), are examined for fairness. The work discusses four significant points: flexibility, intuition, simplicity, and goodness-of-fit of the two mentioned methods. The research findings have shown that the DLMA method is better in every aspect than the DLS method. Further, the data of 1764 ODI matches played during 2004–2021 to investigate the compatibility of the DLMA for high run-scoring One-Day International matches. The results show that DLMA is compatible to the situation of the well-above run-scoring situation.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference41 articles.
1. A successful operational research intervention in one-day cricket;FC Duckworth;Journal of the Operational Research Society,2004
2. The Duckworth-Lewis-Stern method: extending the Duckworth-Lewis methodology to deal with modern scoring rates;SE Stern;Journal of the Operational Research Society,2016
3. Comment on Clarke and Allsopp (2001). Fair measures of performance: The World Cup of Cricket;FC Duckworth;Journal of the Operational Research Society,2001
4. Estimation of the Magnitude of Victory in One‐day Cricket RMIT University, Mayo Clinic Rochester and Simon Fraser University.;BM De Silva;Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics,2001
5. Predicting the match outcome in one day international cricket matches, while the game is in progress;M Bailey;J Sports Sci Med,2006
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献