Abstract
Background
The number of days spent at home in the last six months of life has been proposed as a comprehensive indicator of high-value patient-centered care; however, information regarding the determinants of this outcome is scarce, particularly among the general population. We investigated the determinants of spending time at home within the six months preceding death.
Methods
Population-based, retrospective analysis of administrative databases of the Catalan government. The analysis included adult (≥18 years) individuals who died in Catalonia (North-east Spain) in 2017 and met the McNamara criteria for palliative care. The primary outcome was the number of days spent at home within the last 180 days of life. Other variables included the cause of death, demographic characteristics, and socioeconomic status, stratified as very low, low, mid, and high level.
Results
The analysis included 40,137 individuals (19,510 women; 20,627 men), who spent a median of 140 days (IQR 16–171) at home within the six months preceding death (women 140 [16–171]; men 150 [100–171]). Female gender was an independent factor of staying fewer days at home (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.77–0.82]; p<0.001). Higher socioeconomic levels were significantly associated with an increasing number of days at home in both genders: among women, ORs of the low, middle, and high levels were 1.09 (0.97–1.22), 1.54 (1.36–1.75), and 2.52 (1.69–3.75) (p<0.001), respectively; the corresponding ORs among men were 1.27 (1.12–1.43), 1.56 (1.38–1.77), 2.82 (2.04–3.88) (p<0.001). The presence of dementia was a strong predictor of spending less time at home in women (0.41 (0.38–0.43); p<0.001) and men (0.45 (0.41–0.48); p<0.001).
Conclusions
Our results suggest that end-of-life care is associated with gender and socioeconomic inequalities; women and individuals with lower socioeconomic status spend less time at home within the last 180 days of life.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference31 articles.
1. The good news: It’s our 60th birthday—The bad news: A giant, geriatric tsunami!;FT Sherman;Geriatrics,2006
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Palliative Care for Older People: better practices. 2004 [cited 10 Jul 2020]. Available: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/98235/E82933.pdf
3. Are regional variations in end-of-life care intensity explained by patient preferences?: A study of the US medicare population.;AE Barnato;Med Care,2007
4. Place of care in advanced cancer: A qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences;IJ Higginson;J Palliat Med,2000
5. Family perspectives on aggressive cancer care near the end of life;AA Wright;JAMA—J Am Med Assoc,2016
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献