Abstract
Introduction
Digital technology has the potential to improve health outcomes and health system performance in fragmented and under-funded mental health systems. Despite this potential, the integration of digital technology tools into mental health systems has been relatively poor. This is a protocol for a synthesis of qualitative evidence that will aim to determine the barriers and facilitators to integrating digital technologies in mental health systems and classify them in contextual domains at individual, organisational and system levels.
Methods and analysis
The methodological framework for systematic review of qualitative evidence described in Lockwood et al. will be applied to this review. A draft search strategy was developed in collaboration with an experienced senior health research librarian. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Google Scholar, as well as hand searching of reference lists and reviews will identify relevant studies for inclusion. Study selection will be carried out independently by two authors, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. The quality of selected studies will be assessed using JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data will be charted using JBI QUARI Data Extraction Tool for Qualitative Research. Findings will be defined and classified both deductively in a priori conceptual framework and inductively by a thematic analysis. Results will be reported based on the Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research. The level of confidence of the findings will be assessed using GRADE-CERQual.
Ethics and dissemination
This study does not require ethics approval. The systematic review will inform policy and practices around improving the integration of digital technologies into mental health care systems.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference65 articles.
1. A review of the economic impact of mental illness;C.M. Doran;Aust Health Rev,2019
2. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness;D. Vigo;Lancet Psychiatry,2016
3. Parity of esteem between mental and physical health;C. Millard;Bmj,2014
4. Mental health research funding: too little, too inequitable, too skewed;V. Patel;Lancet psychiatry,2020
5. Mental health-related stigma in health care and mental health-care settings;C. Henderson;Lancet Psychiatry,2014
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献