Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy

Author:

Islam Md RafiulORCID,Oraby Tamer,McCombs AudreyORCID,Chowdhury Mohammad MihrabORCID,Al-Mamun Mohammad,Tyshenko Michael G.,Kadelka ClausORCID

Abstract

Background Anticipating an initial shortage of vaccines for COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States developed priority vaccine allocations for specific demographic groups in the population. This study evaluates the performance of the CDC vaccine allocation strategy with respect to multiple potentially competing vaccination goals (minimizing mortality, cases, infections, and years of life lost (YLL)), under the same framework as the CDC allocation: four priority vaccination groups and population demographics stratified by age, comorbidities, occupation and living condition (congested or non-congested). Methods and findings We developed a compartmental disease model that incorporates key elements of the current pandemic including age-varying susceptibility to infection, age-varying clinical fraction, an active case-count dependent social distancing level, and time-varying infectivity (accounting for the emergence of more infectious virus strains). The CDC allocation strategy is compared to all other possibly optimal allocations that stagger vaccine roll-out in up to four phases (17.5 million strategies). The CDC allocation strategy performed well in all vaccination goals but never optimally. Under the developed model, the CDC allocation deviated from the optimal allocations by small amounts, with 0.19% more deaths, 4.0% more cases, 4.07% more infections, and 0.97% higher YLL, than the respective optimal strategies. The CDC decision to not prioritize the vaccination of individuals under the age of 16 was optimal, as was the prioritization of health-care workers and other essential workers over non-essential workers. Finally, a higher prioritization of individuals with comorbidities in all age groups improved outcomes compared to the CDC allocation. Conclusion The developed approach can be used to inform the design of future vaccine allocation strategies in the United States, or adapted for use by other countries seeking to optimize the effectiveness of their vaccine allocation strategies.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference53 articles.

1. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Updated Interim Recommendation for Allocating Initial Supplies of COVID-19 Vaccine—United States, 2020;K Dooling;Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,2021

2. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Interim Recommendation for Allocating Initial Supplies of COVID-19 Vaccine—United States, 2020;K Dooling;Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,2020

3. COVID-19 Vaccine Allocation: Modeling Health Outcomes and Equity Implications of Alternative Strategies;M Ferranna;Engineering,2021

4. Dynamic prioritization of COVID-19 vaccines when social distancing is limited for essential workers;JH Buckner;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2021

5. Modelling optimal vaccination strategy for SARS-CoV-2 in the UK;S Moore;PLoS computational biology,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3