Discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and hospital autopsy: A comparative retrospective analysis of 1,112 cases

Author:

Kurz Stephan D.,Sido ViyanORCID,Herbst Hermann,Ulm Bernhard,Salkic Erma,Ruschinski Thomas M.,Buschmann Claas T.,Tsokos Michael

Abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to compare discrepancies between diagnosed and autopsied causes of death in 1,112 hospital autopsies and to determine the factors causing this discrepancies. Methods 1,112 hospital autopsies between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Ante-mortem diagnoses were compared to causes of death as determined by autopsy. Clinical diagnoses were extracted from the autopsy request form, and post-mortem diagnoses were assessed from respective autopsy reports. Variables, such as sex, age, Body Mass Index, category of disease, duration of hospital stay and new-borns were studied in comparison to discrepancy. P-values were derived from the Mann-Whitney U test for the constant features and chi-2 test, p-values < 0,05 were considered significant. Results 73.9% (n = 822) patients showed no discrepancy between autopsy and clinical diagnosis. The duration of hospitalisation (6 vs. 9 days) and diseases of the cardiovascular system (61.7%) had a significant impact on discrepancies. Conclusion Age, cardiovascular diseases and duration of hospital stay significantly affect discrepancies in ante- and post-mortem diagnoses.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference28 articles.

1. The autopsy as an instrument of quality assessment. Classification of premortem and postmortem diagnostic discrepancies;RE Anderson;Arch Pathol Lab Med,1984

2. The autopsy in clinical quality control;AG Scottolini;JAMA,1983

3. Autopsy and medical education: a review;R Charlton;J R Soc Med,1994

4. Insight into the incidence of acute aortic dissection in the German region of Berlin and Brandenburg;SD Kurz;Int J Cardiol,2017

5. Reducing Diagnostic Errors—Why Now?;D Khullar;New England Journal of Medicine,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3