Abstract
Recent innovations in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement methods have led to improvements in accuracy, repeatability, and acquisition speed, and have prompted renewed interest to reevaluate the medical value of quantitative T1. The purpose of this study was to determine the bias and reproducibility of T1 measurements in a variety of MRI systems with an eye toward assessing the feasibility of applying diagnostic threshold T1 measurement across multiple clinical sites. We used the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) system phantom to assess variations of T1 measurements, using a slow, reference standard inversion recovery sequence and a rapid, commonly-available variable flip angle sequence, across MRI systems at 1.5 tesla (T) (two vendors, with number of MRI systems n = 9) and 3 T (three vendors, n = 18). We compared the T1 measurements from inversion recovery and variable flip angle scans to ISMRM/NIST phantom reference values using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to test for statistical differences between T1 measurements grouped according to MRI scanner manufacturers and/or static field strengths. The inversion recovery method had minor over- and under-estimations compared to the NMR-measured T1 values at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Variable flip angle measurements had substantially greater deviations from the NMR-measured T1 values than the inversion recovery measurements. At 3 T, the measured variable flip angle T1 for one vendor is significantly different than the other two vendors for most of the samples throughout the clinically relevant range of T1. There was no consistent pattern of discrepancy between vendors. We suggest establishing rigorous quality control procedures for validating quantitative MRI methods to promote confidence and stability in associated measurement techniques and to enable translation of diagnostic threshold from the research center to the entire clinical community.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference39 articles.
1. Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases;GM Bydder;AJR American journal of roentgenology,1982
2. MR imaging: possibility of tissue characterization of brain tumors using T1 and T2 values;M Komiyama;AJNR American journal of neuroradiology,1987
3. Tissue characterization with T1, T2, and proton density values: results in 160 patients with brain tumors;M Just;Radiology,1988
4. Tissue characterization of intracranial tumors by MR imaging;L Kjaer;In vivo evaluation of T1- and T2-relaxation behavior at 1.5 T. Acta radiologica,1991
5. T1, T2 and proton density measurements in the grading of cerebral gliomas;S Newman;European Radiology,1993
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献