The development of laparoscopic skills using virtual reality simulations: A systematic review

Author:

Taba João Victor,Cortez Vitor Santos,Moraes Walter Augusto,Iuamoto Leandro Ryuchi,Hsing Wu Tu,Suzuki Milena Oliveira,do Nascimento Fernanda Sayuri,Pipek Leonardo ZumerkornORCID,de Mattos Vitoria Carneiro,D’Albuquerque Eugênia Carneiro,Carneiro-D’Albuquerque Luiz AugustoORCID,Meyer AlbertoORCID,Andraus Wellington

Abstract

Background Teaching based on virtual reality simulators in medicine has expanded in recent years due to the limitations of more traditional methods, especially for surgical procedures such as laparoscopy. Purpose of review To analyze the effects of using virtual reality simulations on the development of laparoscopic skills in medical students and physicians. Data sources The literature screening was done in April 2020 through Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Database of the National Institute of Health. Eligibility criteria Randomized clinical trials that subjected medical students and physicians to training in laparoscopic skills in virtual reality simulators. Study appraisal Paired reviewers independently identified 1529 articles and included 7 trials that met the eligibility criteria. Findings In all studies, participants that trained in virtual simulators showed improvements in laparoscopic skills, although the articles that also had a physical model training group did not show better performance of one model compared to the other. Limitations No article beyond 2015 met the eligibility criteria, and the analyzed simulators have different versions and models, which might impact the results. Conclusion Virtual reality simulators are useful educational tools, but do not show proven significant advantages over traditional models. The lack of standardization and a scarcity of articles makes comparative analysis between simulators difficult, requiring more research in the area, according to the model suggested in this review. Systematic review registration number Registered by the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identification code CRD42020176479.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference46 articles.

1. Challenges and opportunities facing medical education;P Densen;Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc,2011

2. Using Technology to Meet the Challenges of Medical Education;PA Guze;Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc,2015

3. Gamification to Motivate the Unmotivated Smoker: The "Take a Break" Digital Health Intervention.;AC Blok;Games Health J,2019

4. Serious games for improving knowledge and self-management in young people with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published correction appears in;N Charlier;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2018

5. Septris: a novel, mobile, online, simulation game that improves sepsis recognition and management;KH Evans;Acad Med,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3