Fate of Protocols Submitted to a French National Funding Scheme: A Cohort Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Fate of Protocols Submitted to a French National Funding Scheme: A Cohort Study

Published:2014-06-30 Issue:6 Volume:9 Page:e99561
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLoS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Decullier Evelyne,Huot Laure,Chapuis François R.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference17 articles.

1. Dickersin K, Min YI (1993) NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online J Curr Clin Trials Doc No 50.

2. Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants;BG Druss;Am J Med,2005

3. Do you have NIH funding? Then read this;US Neill;J Clin Invest,2005

4. (Circulaire du 18 nov. 1992) Appel à candidature relatif à la mise en place d’un programme de recherche clinique dans les hôpitaux (évaluation thérapeutique et diagnostique) financée par la fraction du taux directeur (0.05%) consacré à cet effet.

5. Pico F (1999) Analyse à 6 ans de 168 projets financés dans le cadre du premier Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC 93): Université Paris XI.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. On the very idea of pursuitworthiness;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science;2022-02

2. Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study;Trials;2018-10-23

3. Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.;F1000Research;2018-10-15

4. External Tests of Peer Review Validity Via Impact Measures;Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics;2018-08-23

5. Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study;F1000Research;2018-07-09