Abstract
This article presents a synthesis and analysis drawing from NbS Justice, NBS Indigenous and NbS more-than-human literature, Indigenous governance, Indigenous planning and coexistence planning literature. The aim of this paper is to contribute to understandings of NbS and colonialism through critical reflection, as well as provide tools for action to for researchers and practitioners. In settler-colonial contexts, NbS are colonizing by default. Colonialism operates through producing and growing power asymmetries, which exist in NbS research and practice. These power asymmetries are perpetuated and accelerated by settler NbS practitioners and researchers. However, knowledge co-production that embodies ethical space principles with Indigenous partners in NbS may support power redistribution. To support settler NbS practitioners and researchers, we present a potential process to support mutually beneficial knowledge co-production consisting of three stages; pre-engagement, internal engagement and external/collective engagement.
Funder
Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Simon Fraser University
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference70 articles.
1. Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.;K. Whyte;Engl Lang Notes,2017
2. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges
3. Tackling intersecting climate change and biodiversity emergencies: Opportunities for sustainability transitions research.;J. Bush;Environ Innov Soc Transit.,2021
4. Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation.;A. Chausson;Glob Change Biol,2020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献