Abstract
At interphase, de-condensed chromosomes have a non-random three-dimensional architecture within the nucleus, however, little is known about the extent to which nuclear organisation might influence expression or vice versa. Here, using imprinting as a model, we use 3D RNA- and DNA-fluorescence-in-situ-hybridisation in normal and mutant mouse embryonic stem cell lines to assess the relationship between imprinting control, gene expression and allelic distance from the nuclear periphery. We compared the two parentally inherited imprinted domains at the Dlk1-Dio3 domain and find a small but reproducible trend for the maternally inherited domain to be further away from the periphery however we did not observe an enrichment of inactive alleles in the immediate vicinity of the nuclear envelope. Using Zfp57KO ES cells, which harbour a paternal to maternal epigenotype switch, we observe that expressed alleles are significantly further away from the nuclear periphery.
However, within individual nuclei, alleles closer to the periphery are equally likely to be expressed as those further away. In other words, absolute position does not predict expression. Taken together, this suggests that whilst stochastic activation can cause subtle shifts in localisation for this locus, there is no dramatic relocation of alleles upon gene activation. Our results suggest that transcriptional activity, rather than the parent-of-origin, defines subnuclear localisation at an endogenous imprinted domain.
Funder
deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft
canadian institute for health research
Medical Research Council
Wellcome Trust
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
Cancer Research,Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference43 articles.
1. Lamina-Associated Domains: Links with Chromosome Architecture, Heterochromatin, and Gene Repression;B van Steensel;Cell,2017
2. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells;T Cremer;Nature Reviews Genetics,2001
3. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription;CS Osborne;Nature Genetics,2004
4. Gene Positioning Effects on Expression in Eukaryotes;HQ Nguyen;Annual Review of Genetics,2015
5. Causes and consequences of nuclear gene positioning;S Shachar;Journal of Cell Science,2017