Abstract
Humans have the ability to craft abstract, temporally extended and hierarchically organized plans. For instance, when considering how to make spaghetti for dinner, we typically concern ourselves with useful “subgoals” in the task, such as cutting onions, boiling pasta, and cooking a sauce, rather than particulars such as how many cuts to make to the onion, or exactly which muscles to contract. A core question is how such decomposition of a more abstract task into logical subtasks happens in the first place. Previous research has shown that humans are sensitive to a form of higher-order statistical learning named “community structure”. Community structure is a common feature of abstract tasks characterized by a logical ordering of subtasks. This structure can be captured by a model where humans learn predictions of upcoming events multiple steps into the future, discounting predictions of events further away in time. One such model is the “successor representation”, which has been argued to be useful for hierarchical abstraction. As of yet, no study has convincingly shown that this hierarchical abstraction can be put to use for goal-directed behavior. Here, we investigate whether participants utilize learned community structure to craft hierarchically informed action plans for goal-directed behavior. Participants were asked to search for paintings in a virtual museum, where the paintings were grouped together in “wings” representing community structure in the museum. We find that participants’ choices accord with the hierarchical structure of the museum and that their response times are best predicted by a successor representation. The degree to which the response times reflect the community structure of the museum correlates with several measures of performance, including the ability to craft temporally abstract action plans. These results suggest that successor representation learning subserves hierarchical abstractions relevant for goal-directed behavior.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Research Foundation - Flanders
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference129 articles.
1. Reinforcement learning: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly;P Dayan;Current Opinion in Neurobiology,2008
2. A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward;W Schultz;Science,1997
3. Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response;W. Schultz;Nat Rev Neurosci.,2016
4. Formalizing planning and information search in naturalistic decision-making;LT Hunt;Nat Neurosci,2021