Abstract
Background
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is characterized by potentially disfiguring skin ulcers carrying significant social stigma. To mitigate systemic drug exposure and reduce the toxicity from available treatments, studies addressing new local therapeutic strategies using available medications are coming up. This review systematically compiles preclinical and clinical data on the efficacy of amphotericin B (AmB) administered locally for cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Methodology
Structured searches were conducted in major databases. Clinical studies reporting cure rates and preclinical studies presenting any efficacy outcome were included. Exclusion criteria comprised nonoriginal studies, in vitro investigations, studies with fewer than 10 treated patients, and those evaluating AmB in combination with other antileishmanial drug components.
Principal findings
A total of 21 studies were identified, encompassing 16 preclinical and five clinical studies. Preclinical assessments generally involved the topical use of commercial AmB formulations, often in conjunction with carriers or controlled release systems. However, the variation in the treatment schedules hindered direct comparisons. In clinical studies, topical AmB achieved a pooled cure rate of 45.6% [CI: 27.5–64.8%; I2 = 79.7; p = 0.002), while intralesional (IL) administration resulted in a 69.8% cure rate [CI: 52.3–82.9%; I2 = 63.9; p = 0.06). In the direct comparison available, no significant difference was noted between AmB-IL and meglumine antimoniate-IL administration (OR:1.7; CI:0.34–9.15, I2 = 79.1; p = 0.00), however a very low certainty of evidence was verified.
Conclusions
Different AmB formulations and administration routes have been explored in preclinical and clinical studies. Developing therapeutic technologies is evident. Current findings might be interpreted as a favorable proof of concept for the local AmB administration which makes this intervention eligible to be explored in future well-designed studies towards less toxic treatments for leishmaniasis.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference45 articles.
1. PAHO. Leishmanioses: Informe Epidemiológico das Américas, No. 10 (Dezembro 2021). OPAS; 2021 Dec. Available: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/55386
2. WHOb. Global leishmaniasis surveillance: 2021, assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In: b [Internet]. 2022 [cited 5 Jun 2023]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer9745-575-590
3. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2009–2010. A pilot study;AC de Castro Toledo;Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg,2013
4. The mosquitoes that destroy your faceSocial impact of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in South-eastern Morocco, A qualitative study.;I Bennis;PLoS One.,2017
5. Cutaneous leishmaniasis treatment and therapeutic outcomes in special populations: A collaborative retrospective study.;M Castro M del;PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2023