Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science

Author:

Avissar-Whiting Michele,Belliard Frédérique,Bertozzi Stefano M.,Brand Amy,Brown Katherine,Clément-Stoneham Géraldine,Dawson Stephanie,Dey Gautam,Ecer Daniel,Edmunds Scott C.,Farley Ashley,Fischer Tara D.,Franko Maryrose,Fraser James S.,Funk Kathryn,Ganier Clarisse,Harrison Melissa,Hatch Anna,Hazlett Haley,Hindle Samantha,Hook Daniel W.,Hurst Phil,Kamoun Sophien,Kiley Robert,Lacy Michael M.,LaFlamme Marcel,Lawrence Rebecca,Lemberger Thomas,Leptin Maria,Lumb Elliott,MacCallum Catriona J.,Marcum Christopher Steven,Marinello Gabriele,Mendonça Alex,Monaco Sara,Neves Kleber,Pattinson Damian,Polka Jessica K.ORCID,Puebla IratxeORCID,Rittman Martyn,Royle Stephen J.,Saderi Daniela,Sever Richard,Shearer Kathleen,Spiro John E.,Stern Bodo,Taraborelli Dario,Vale Ron,Vasquez Claudia G.,Waltman Ludo,Watt Fiona M.,Weinberg Zara Y.,Williams Mark

Abstract

Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer review at journals is coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack of transparency. As preprints become more widely used and accepted, they raise the possibility of rethinking the peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial than traditional journal peer review, and to thus fundamentally shift the culture of peer review toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call to action to stakeholders in the community to accelerate the growing momentum of preprint sharing and provide recommendations to empower researchers to provide open and constructive peer review for preprints.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference41 articles.

1. Peer review: Troubled from the start;A. Csiszar;Nature,2016

2. THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965;N Moxham;Hist J,2018

3. Sense about Science, Elsevier. Quality, Trust and Peer Review. 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/resource-library/trust-in-research-report.

4. Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers;A Mulligan;J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol,2013

5. Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off;A. Dance;Nature,2023

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3