Four principles to establish a universal virus taxonomy

Author:

Simmonds PeterORCID,Adriaenssens Evelien M.,Zerbini F. Murilo,Abrescia Nicola G. A.,Aiewsakun Pakorn,Alfenas-Zerbini Poliane,Bao Yiming,Barylski Jakub,Drosten Christian,Duffy Siobain,Duprex W. Paul,Dutilh Bas E.,Elena Santiago F.,García Maria Laura,Junglen Sandra,Katzourakis Aris,Koonin Eugene V.,Krupovic Mart,Kuhn Jens H.,Lambert Amy J.,Lefkowitz Elliot J.,Łobocka Małgorzata,Lood Cédric,Mahony Jennifer,Meier-Kolthoff Jan P.,Mushegian Arcady R.,Oksanen Hanna M.,Poranen Minna M.,Reyes-Muñoz Alejandro,Robertson David L.,Roux Simon,Rubino Luisa,Sabanadzovic Sead,Siddell Stuart,Skern Tim,Smith Donald B.,Sullivan Matthew B.,Suzuki Nobuhiro,Turner Dann,Van Doorslaer Koenraad,Vandamme Anne-Mieke,Varsani Arvind,Vasilakis Nikos

Abstract

A universal taxonomy of viruses is essential for a comprehensive view of the virus world and for communicating the complicated evolutionary relationships among viruses. However, there are major differences in the conceptualisation and approaches to virus classification and nomenclature among virologists, clinicians, agronomists, and other interested parties. Here, we provide recommendations to guide the construction of a coherent and comprehensive virus taxonomy, based on expert scientific consensus. Firstly, assignments of viruses should be congruent with the best attainable reconstruction of their evolutionary histories, i.e., taxa should be monophyletic. This fundamental principle for classification of viruses is currently included in the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) code only for the rank of species. Secondly, phenotypic and ecological properties of viruses may inform, but not override, evolutionary relatedness in the placement of ranks. Thirdly, alternative classifications that consider phenotypic attributes, such as being vector-borne (e.g., “arboviruses”), infecting a certain type of host (e.g., “mycoviruses,” “bacteriophages”) or displaying specific pathogenicity (e.g., “human immunodeficiency viruses”), may serve important clinical and regulatory purposes but often create polyphyletic categories that do not reflect evolutionary relationships. Nevertheless, such classifications ought to be maintained if they serve the needs of specific communities or play a practical clinical or regulatory role. However, they should not be considered or called taxonomies. Finally, while an evolution-based framework enables viruses discovered by metagenomics to be incorporated into the ICTV taxonomy, there are essential requirements for quality control of the sequence data used for these assignments. Combined, these four principles will enable future development and expansion of virus taxonomy as the true evolutionary diversity of viruses becomes apparent.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Academy of Finland

Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö

U.S. National Library of Medicine

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Agencia Estatal de Investigación

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

United Kingdom Medical Research Council

Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Science Foundation Ireland

National Institutes of Health

FINStruct and Instruct-ERIC research infrastructure

Austrian Science Fund

Office of Science

National Science Foundation

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

KU Leuven Research Council

Research Foundation – Flanders

US National Science Foundation

Professional Association of the Alliance of International Science Organizations

Open Biodiversity and Health Big Data Programme of IUBS

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Neuroscience

Reference100 articles.

1. Classifying viruses at higher levels: Symmetry and structure of virus particles as criteria;P. Wildy;Symp Soc Gen Microbiol,1961

2. A chemical basis for the classification of animal viruses;PD Cooper;Nature,1961

3. Contributions to characterization and classification of animal viruses;VV Hamparian;Proc Soc Exp Biol Med,1963

4. The classification of viruses;A Lwoff;Annu Rev Microbiol,1966

5. It is time for a new type of type to facilitate naming the microbial world.;M Palmer;New Microbes New Infect.,2022

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3