Abstract
A universal taxonomy of viruses is essential for a comprehensive view of the virus world and for communicating the complicated evolutionary relationships among viruses. However, there are major differences in the conceptualisation and approaches to virus classification and nomenclature among virologists, clinicians, agronomists, and other interested parties. Here, we provide recommendations to guide the construction of a coherent and comprehensive virus taxonomy, based on expert scientific consensus. Firstly, assignments of viruses should be congruent with the best attainable reconstruction of their evolutionary histories, i.e., taxa should be monophyletic. This fundamental principle for classification of viruses is currently included in the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) code only for the rank of species. Secondly, phenotypic and ecological properties of viruses may inform, but not override, evolutionary relatedness in the placement of ranks. Thirdly, alternative classifications that consider phenotypic attributes, such as being vector-borne (e.g., “arboviruses”), infecting a certain type of host (e.g., “mycoviruses,” “bacteriophages”) or displaying specific pathogenicity (e.g., “human immunodeficiency viruses”), may serve important clinical and regulatory purposes but often create polyphyletic categories that do not reflect evolutionary relationships. Nevertheless, such classifications ought to be maintained if they serve the needs of specific communities or play a practical clinical or regulatory role. However, they should not be considered or called taxonomies. Finally, while an evolution-based framework enables viruses discovered by metagenomics to be incorporated into the ICTV taxonomy, there are essential requirements for quality control of the sequence data used for these assignments. Combined, these four principles will enable future development and expansion of virus taxonomy as the true evolutionary diversity of viruses becomes apparent.
Funder
Wellcome Trust
Academy of Finland
Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö
U.S. National Library of Medicine
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
United Kingdom Medical Research Council
Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Science Foundation Ireland
National Institutes of Health
FINStruct and Instruct-ERIC research infrastructure
Austrian Science Fund
Office of Science
National Science Foundation
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
KU Leuven Research Council
Research Foundation – Flanders
US National Science Foundation
Professional Association of the Alliance of International Science Organizations
Open Biodiversity and Health Big Data Programme of IUBS
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Neuroscience
Reference100 articles.
1. Classifying viruses at higher levels: Symmetry and structure of virus particles as criteria;P. Wildy;Symp Soc Gen Microbiol,1961
2. A chemical basis for the classification of animal viruses;PD Cooper;Nature,1961
3. Contributions to characterization and classification of animal viruses;VV Hamparian;Proc Soc Exp Biol Med,1963
4. The classification of viruses;A Lwoff;Annu Rev Microbiol,1966
5. It is time for a new type of type to facilitate naming the microbial world.;M Palmer;New Microbes New Infect.,2022