Abstract
Many people engage with a diverse array of social media platforms, raising concerns that this diversity of platforms may be linked to negative affect, hypothesized to arise from multitasking or identify diffusion. Using a large representative sample (N = 1,372) of US adults from the authoritative General Social Survey, we examine associations between social media diversity and well-being and propose a self-selection explanation for these associations. Even without accounting for selection bias, we find few and only small associations. Importantly, after using a rigorous propensity-score weighting technique to adjust for selection bias, these associations disappear. Further, we also document few negative associations between the use of specific social media platforms and well-being. Our findings suggest that (i) diverse social media use is not a major risk factor to adult well-being; (ii) negative correlations reported in the literature may be spurious; (iii) technology use research needs to take self-selection biases seriously.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference59 articles.
1. we are social, Hootsuite. Digital 2020: 3.8 billion people use social media. 2020. Available: https://wearesocial.com/blog/2020/01/digital-2020-3-8-billion-people-use-social-media
2. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship;m boyd danah;Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,2007
3. Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among U.S. young adults;BA Primack;Computers in Human Behavior,2017
4. Use of Multiple Social Media Platforms in Relation to Psychological Functioning in Emerging Adults;A Vannucci;Emerging Adulthood,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献