General practitioners’ perceptions of using virtual primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international cross-sectional survey study

Author:

Li EdmondORCID,Tsopra RosyORCID,Jimenez GeronimoORCID,Serafini AliceORCID,Gusso GustavoORCID,Lingner Heidrun,Fernandez Maria JoseORCID,Irving GregORCID,Petek Davorina,Hoffman RobertORCID,Lazic VanjaORCID,Memarian EnsiehORCID,Koskela TuomasORCID,Collins ClaireORCID,Espitia Sandra MilenaORCID,Clavería AnaORCID,Nessler Katarzyna,O’Neill Braden GregoryORCID,Hoedebecke Kyle,Ungan MehmetORCID,Laranjo LilianaORCID,Ghafur Saira,Fontana GianlucaORCID,Majeed AzeemORCID,Car Josip,Darzi AraORCID,Neves Ana Luisa

Abstract

With the onset of COVID-19, general practitioners (GPs) and patients worldwide swiftly transitioned from face-to-face to digital remote consultations. There is a need to evaluate how this global shift has impacted patient care, healthcare providers, patient and carer experience, and health systems. We explored GPs’ perspectives on the main benefits and challenges of using digital virtual care. GPs across 20 countries completed an online questionnaire between June–September 2020. GPs’ perceptions of main barriers and challenges were explored using free-text questions. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. A total of 1,605 respondents participated in our survey. The benefits identified included reducing COVID-19 transmission risks, guaranteeing access and continuity of care, improved efficiency, faster access to care, improved convenience and communication with patients, greater work flexibility for providers, and hastening the digital transformation of primary care and accompanying legal frameworks. Main challenges included patients’ preference for face-to-face consultations, digital exclusion, lack of physical examinations, clinical uncertainty, delays in diagnosis and treatment, overuse and misuse of digital virtual care, and unsuitability for certain types of consultations. Other challenges include the lack of formal guidance, higher workloads, remuneration issues, organisational culture, technical difficulties, implementation and financial issues, and regulatory weaknesses. At the frontline of care delivery, GPs can provide important insights on what worked well, why, and how during the pandemic. Lessons learned can be used to inform the adoption of improved virtual care solutions and support the long-term development of platforms that are more technologically robust and secure.

Funder

European General Practice Research Network

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference64 articles.

1. Telephone consultations;LS Van Galen;BMJ,2018

2. Virtual Visits and Patient-Centered Care: Results of a Patient Survey and Observational Study;KM McGrail;J Med Internet Res,2017

3. Diabetes Care in the Digital Era: a Synoptic Overview;F Fatehi;Curr Diabetes Reports 2018 187,2018

4. Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study;T Greenhalgh;BMJ Open,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3