Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review

Author:

Assunção-Costa LindembergORCID,Costa de Sousa IvelliseORCID,Alves de Oliveira Maria Rafaela,Ribeiro Pinto Charleston,Machado Juliana Ferreira Fernandes,Valli Cleidenete Gomes,de Souza Luís Eugênio Portela Fernandes

Abstract

Purpose This study systematically reviewed studies to determine the frequency and nature of medication administration errors in Latin American hospitals. Summary We systematically searched the medical literature of seven electronic databases to identify studies on medication administration errors in Latin American hospitals using the direct observation method. Studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese between 1946 and March 2021 were included. A total of 10 studies conducted at 22 hospitals were included in the review. Nursing professionals were the most frequently observed during medication administration and were observers in four of the ten included studies. Total number of error opportunities was used as a parameter to calculate error rates. The administration error rate had a median of 32% (interquartile range 16%–35.8%) with high variability in the described frequencies (9%–64%). Excluding time errors, the median error rate was 9.7% (interquartile range 7.4%–29.5%). Four different definitions of medication errors were used in these studies. The most frequently observed errors were time, dose, and omission. Only four studies described the therapeutic classes or groups involved in the errors, with systemic anti-infectives being the most reported. None of the studies assessed the severity or outcome of the errors. The assessment of the overall risk bias revealed that one study had low risk, three had moderate risk, and three had high risk. In the assessment of the exploratory, observational, and before-after studies, two were classified as having fair quality and one as having poor quality. Conclusion The administration error rate in Latin America was high, even when time errors were excluded. The variation observed in the frequencies can be explained by the different contexts in which the study was conducted. Future research using direct observation techniques is necessary to more accurately estimate the nature and severity of medication administration errors.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference48 articles.

1. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: A systematic review;EN De Vries;Qual Saf Heal Care,2008

2. Medication Without Harm: WHO’s Third Global Patient Safety Challenge;LJ Donaldson;Lancet,2017

3. Preventable adverse drug events among inpatients: A systematic review;PJ Gates;Pediatrics,2018

4. Advancing the responsible use of medicines: applying levers for change;for the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics,2012

5. Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital;RM Wilson;BMJ,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3